Societal polarisation and capitalist democracy

Societal polarisation is inherent to capitalist democracy, which is grounded on the reproduction of structural inequalities required by the workings of the capitalist system. The scope for the exercise of democratic rights, including the rights of academic freedom and autonomy is restricted and subordinated to capitalist interests, a dynamic exacerbated by the empowered rise of illiberal political projects, in particular those led by far-right actors, and by associated neocolonial processes in the peripheries of global capitalist democracies. The current episode of the long-term ‘war in Gaza’ has exposed these contradictions in the core Western capitalist democracies questioning the strength of their commitment to academic freedom and autonomy and to the defense of the basic principles of democracy. This succinct response to Hanafi’s article includes some examples to illustrate this intrinsic character of societal polarisation in capitalist democracies and reflects on key challenges facing dialogical sociology partnered with dialogical liberalism in the current global context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in sociology.
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768667251359711
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Societal polarisation and capitalist democracy

José Esteban Castro
Dialogues in sociology.
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Societal polarisation and capitalist democracy

José Esteban Castro
article en

Abstract

Societal polarisation is inherent to capitalist democracy, which is grounded on the reproduction of structural inequalities required by the workings of the capitalist system. The scope for the exercise of democratic rights, including the rights of academic freedom and autonomy is restricted and subordinated to capitalist interests, a dynamic exacerbated by the empowered rise of illiberal political projects, in particular those led by far-right actors, and by associated neocolonial processes in the peripheries of global capitalist democracies. The current episode of the long-term ‘war in Gaza’ has exposed these contradictions in the core Western capitalist democracies questioning the strength of their commitment to academic freedom and autonomy and to the defense of the basic principles of democracy. This succinct response to Hanafi’s article includes some examples to illustrate this intrinsic character of societal polarisation in capitalist democracies and reflects on key challenges facing dialogical sociology partnered with dialogical liberalism in the current global context.

Dialogues in sociology.Vol. 1(2)
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.