Cost–Consequence Analysis of Semaglutide vs. Liraglutide for Managing Obese Prediabetic and Diabetic Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Single-Center Study

<b>Background</b>: Semaglutide and Liraglutide are medications in the Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1 RAs) class used to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in Saudi Arabia. Although the 1.0 mg once weekly dosage of Semaglutide does not have a labeled indication for the management of obesity, many believe that this dosage is more effective than the 3.0 mg once daily Liraglutide dosage for the management of both diabetes and obesity. <b>Objective</b>: To compare the effectiveness of the dosage of 1.0 mg of Semaglutide administered once weekly versus 3.0 mg of Liraglutide administered once daily in controlling HbA1c levels, promoting weight loss, and evaluating their financial implications among obese patients in Saudi Arabia using real-world data. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) from January 2021 to June 2024 was conducted on patients prescribed Semaglutide or Liraglutide for at least 12 months. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing severe conditions (e.g., cardiovascular disease, stroke, or cancer) and missing baseline data. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in HbA1c, weight, and direct medical costs. <b>Results</b>: Two hundred patients (100 patients on the 1.0 mg once weekly dose of Semaglutide and 100 patients on the 3.0 mg once daily dose of Liraglutide) of those randomly selected from the EMRs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Of the 200 eligible patients (65.5% female, mean age 48.54 years), weight loss was greater with Semaglutide (-8.09 kg) than Liraglutide (-5.884 kg). HbA1c reduction was also greater with Semaglutide (-1.073%) than Liraglutide (-0.298%). The use of Semaglutide resulted in lower costs of USD -1264.76 (95% CI: -1826.82 to 33.76) and greater reductions in weight of -2.22 KG (95% CI: -7.68 to -2.784), as well as lower costs of USD -1264.76 (95% CI: (-2368.16 to -239.686) and greater reductions in HbA1c of -0.77% (95% CI: -0.923 to -0.0971) in more than 95% of the cost effectiveness bootstrap distributions. <b>Conclusions</b>: Semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly seems to be more effective and cost-saving in managing prediabetes, diabetes, and obesity compared to Liraglutide 3.0 mg daily. Future studies should examine these findings using a more representative sample and a robust study design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141755
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost–Consequence Analysis of Semaglutide vs. Liraglutide for Managing Obese Prediabetic and Diabetic Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Single-Center Study

Yazed AlRuthia, Huda F. Al-Hasinah, Najla Bawazeer, Seham Bin Ganzal
3 links
Healthcare
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Cost–Consequence Analysis of Semaglutide vs. Liraglutide for Managing Obese Prediabetic and Diabetic Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Single-Center Study

Yazed AlRuthia, Huda F. Al-Hasinah, Najla Bawazeer, Seham Bin Ganzal
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Semaglutide and Liraglutide are medications in the Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1 RAs) class used to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in Saudi Arabia. Although the 1.0 mg once weekly dosage of Semaglutide does not have a labeled indication for the management of obesity, many believe that this dosage is more effective than the 3.0 mg once daily Liraglutide dosage for the management of both diabetes and obesity. <b>Objective</b>: To compare the effectiveness of the dosage of 1.0 mg of Semaglutide administered once weekly versus 3.0 mg of Liraglutide administered once daily in controlling HbA1c levels, promoting weight loss, and evaluating their financial implications among obese patients in Saudi Arabia using real-world data. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) from January 2021 to June 2024 was conducted on patients prescribed Semaglutide or Liraglutide for at least 12 months. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing severe conditions (e.g., cardiovascular disease, stroke, or cancer) and missing baseline data. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in HbA1c, weight, and direct medical costs. <b>Results</b>: Two hundred patients (100 patients on the 1.0 mg once weekly dose of Semaglutide and 100 patients on the 3.0 mg once daily dose of Liraglutide) of those randomly selected from the EMRs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Of the 200 eligible patients (65.5% female, mean age 48.54 years), weight loss was greater with Semaglutide (-8.09 kg) than Liraglutide (-5.884 kg). HbA1c reduction was also greater with Semaglutide (-1.073%) than Liraglutide (-0.298%). The use of Semaglutide resulted in lower costs of USD -1264.76 (95% CI: -1826.82 to 33.76) and greater reductions in weight of -2.22 KG (95% CI: -7.68 to -2.784), as well as lower costs of USD -1264.76 (95% CI: (-2368.16 to -239.686) and greater reductions in HbA1c of -0.77% (95% CI: -0.923 to -0.0971) in more than 95% of the cost effectiveness bootstrap distributions. <b>Conclusions</b>: Semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly seems to be more effective and cost-saving in managing prediabetes, diabetes, and obesity compared to Liraglutide 3.0 mg daily. Future studies should examine these findings using a more representative sample and a robust study design.

HealthcareVol. 13(14)
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA), King Saud University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.