Sex-specific relationships between sprint swim performance and tethered swimming in high-performance swimmers
This study investigated the relationship between sprint swim performance and outputs derived from fully-tethered and semi-tethered swimming assessments in high-performance male and female swimmers. Twenty elite/highly trained swimmers (9 females, 11 males), specialising in 50-100 m events, completed all assessments in a randomised order in a 25 m pool. 50 m time-trial variables included total time, stroke rate, stroke length and swim velocity. A fully-tethered protocol involved 20 s of maximal swimming to determine peak and mean force, impulse and stroke rate. A semi-tethered protocol required swimmers sprinting 10 m with incremental loads (1, 3, 5 kg for females; 1, 5, 9 kg for males). Load-velocity and force-velocity profiling derived theoretical maximum velocity (V<sub>0</sub>), theoretical maximal load/force (L<sub>0</sub>/F<sub>0</sub>), relative to body mass (rL<sub>0</sub>/rF<sub>0</sub>) and absolute and relative slope between the two variables. All semi-tethered variables except slopes showed large to extremely large correlations with 50 m total time (<i>r</i> = -0.618 to -0.955, <i>p</i> < 0.05) in males and females. In contrast, fully-tethered variables showed heterogeneous correlations, suggesting stroke- and sex-specific analyses may be more appropriate. These findings highlight semi-tethered profiling as an effective and ecologically valid tool for assessing sprint performance in high-performance swimmers and informing targeted training interventions.
Authors
- Carla B. McCabe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1184-6461)
- Rodney Kennedy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1312-1683)
- Ryan Keating (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1836-3098)
Institutions
- University of Ulster (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sports Biomechanics
- Published
- 2025-07-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2530593
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Sports Performance and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.16
Funders
- Department for the Economy
- Loughborough University