A Binary Discounting Method for Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Projects: Applicability Study Based on Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH)

Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a key element of the transition to a low-carbon energy system, leading to a growing interest in accurate and sustainable assessment of its economic viability. Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) is one of the most widely used metrics for comparing hydrogen production technologies and informing investment decisions. However, traditional LCOH calculation methods apply a single discount rate to all cash flows without distinguishing between the risks associated with outflows and inflows. This approach may yield a systematic overestimation of costs, especially in capital-intensive projects. In this study, we adapt a binary cash flow discounting model, previously proposed in the finance literature, for hydrogen energy systems. The model employs two distinct discount rates, one for costs and one for revenues, with a rate structure based on the required return and the risk-free rate, thereby ensuring that arbitrage conditions are not present. Our approach allows the range of possible LCOH values to be determined, eliminating the methodological errors inherent in traditional formulas. A numerical analysis is performed to assess the impact of a change in the general rate of return on the final LCOH value. The method is tested on five typical hydrogen production technologies with fixed productivity and cost parameters. The results show that the traditional approach consistently overestimates costs, whereas the binary model provides a more balanced and risk-adjusted representation of costs, particularly for projects with high capital expenditures. These findings may be useful for investors, policymakers, and researchers developing tools to support and evaluate hydrogen energy projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18143839
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Binary Discounting Method for Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Projects: Applicability Study Based on Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH)

Sergey Galevskiy, Haidong Qian
4 citations
Energies
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
article

A Binary Discounting Method for Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Projects: Applicability Study Based on Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH)

Sergey Galevskiy, Haidong Qian
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a key element of the transition to a low-carbon energy system, leading to a growing interest in accurate and sustainable assessment of its economic viability. Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) is one of the most widely used metrics for comparing hydrogen production technologies and informing investment decisions. However, traditional LCOH calculation methods apply a single discount rate to all cash flows without distinguishing between the risks associated with outflows and inflows. This approach may yield a systematic overestimation of costs, especially in capital-intensive projects. In this study, we adapt a binary cash flow discounting model, previously proposed in the finance literature, for hydrogen energy systems. The model employs two distinct discount rates, one for costs and one for revenues, with a rate structure based on the required return and the risk-free rate, thereby ensuring that arbitrage conditions are not present. Our approach allows the range of possible LCOH values to be determined, eliminating the methodological errors inherent in traditional formulas. A numerical analysis is performed to assess the impact of a change in the general rate of return on the final LCOH value. The method is tested on five typical hydrogen production technologies with fixed productivity and cost parameters. The results show that the traditional approach consistently overestimates costs, whereas the binary model provides a more balanced and risk-adjusted representation of costs, particularly for projects with high capital expenditures. These findings may be useful for investors, policymakers, and researchers developing tools to support and evaluate hydrogen energy projects.

EnergiesVol. 18(14)
Saint Petersburg Mining University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.