Disabling misperceptions? How employees (D)evaluate the labor force participation of people with disabilities

We analyze how employees perceive and evaluate the integration of people with disabilities into the German labor market. In an experimental complement to the Employment Survey by the German Federal Institutes for Vocational Training and Occupational Safety and Health, we ask respondents to estimate the labor force participation rates of persons with and without disabilities. We then inform a subsample about the actual gap between the rates. Regardless of having a disability, respondents are aware of a participation gap, share similar beliefs about its causes, and rate integration as less advanced when they are informed about a larger gap than expected. The largest differences exist in perceptions of the size of the gap and policy preferences: Respondents with disabilities perceive a smaller gap and are more in favor of integrative policies than those without disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Labour Market Research
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-025-00400-6
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disabling misperceptions? How employees (D)evaluate the labor force participation of people with disabilities

Julian Jäger, Miriam Beblo, Elisabeth Sattler-Bublitz
Journal for Labour Market Research
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Disabling misperceptions? How employees (D)evaluate the labor force participation of people with disabilities

Julian Jäger, Miriam Beblo, Elisabeth Sattler-Bublitz
article en

Abstract

We analyze how employees perceive and evaluate the integration of people with disabilities into the German labor market. In an experimental complement to the Employment Survey by the German Federal Institutes for Vocational Training and Occupational Safety and Health, we ask respondents to estimate the labor force participation rates of persons with and without disabilities. We then inform a subsample about the actual gap between the rates. Regardless of having a disability, respondents are aware of a participation gap, share similar beliefs about its causes, and rate integration as less advanced when they are informed about a larger gap than expected. The largest differences exist in perceptions of the size of the gap and policy preferences: Respondents with disabilities perceive a smaller gap and are more in favor of integrative policies than those without disabilities.

Journal for Labour Market ResearchVol. 59(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Universität Hamburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disabling misperceptions? How employees (D)evaluate the labor force participation of people with disabilities — Julian Jäger, Miriam Beblo, et al. · Journal for Labour Market Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS