Spatial Cost–Benefit Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Implementation in Siliana Governorate, Northeast of Tunisia

ABSTRACT An investigation was made into the efficiency of conservation agriculture implementation in Siliana governorate, northeast Tunisia, through a spatial cost–benefit analysis using the Desertification Mitigation Cost‐Effectiveness modeling approach (DESMICE). We defined the applicability limitations of conservation agriculture using biophysical and economic factors. Average incremental benefit was calculated based on observations of farmers who adopted conservation agriculture and extrapolated for each grid cell using environmental and economic factors. Finally, grid cell and aggregated net present values were calculated. Results showed that adopting conservation agriculture leads to a positive incremental benefit. More than 56% of the area showed a net present value higher than 6000 Tunisian Dinars per hectare (TND/ha). This value is significantly higher than the annual income of a farm worker paid at the guaranteed minimum agricultural wage (Approximately 5284 TND/year assuming 260 working days).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70071
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Cost–Benefit Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Implementation in Siliana Governorate, Northeast of Tunisia

Boubaker Dhehibi, Mourad Rekik, Ayoub Fouzaï, Aymen Frija et al.
Land Degradation and Development
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
article

Spatial Cost–Benefit Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Implementation in Siliana Governorate, Northeast of Tunisia

Boubaker Dhehibi, Mourad Rekik, Ayoub Fouzaï, Aymen Frija, Mohamed Arbi Abdeladhim, Luuk Fleskens
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT An investigation was made into the efficiency of conservation agriculture implementation in Siliana governorate, northeast Tunisia, through a spatial cost–benefit analysis using the Desertification Mitigation Cost‐Effectiveness modeling approach (DESMICE). We defined the applicability limitations of conservation agriculture using biophysical and economic factors. Average incremental benefit was calculated based on observations of farmers who adopted conservation agriculture and extrapolated for each grid cell using environmental and economic factors. Finally, grid cell and aggregated net present values were calculated. Results showed that adopting conservation agriculture leads to a positive incremental benefit. More than 56% of the area showed a net present value higher than 6000 Tunisian Dinars per hectare (TND/ha). This value is significantly higher than the annual income of a farm worker paid at the guaranteed minimum agricultural wage (Approximately 5284 TND/year assuming 260 working days).

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 36(18)
University of Carthage (TN), International Drilling Services (Tunisia) (TN), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, International Fund for Agricultural Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.