Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Plus in Ophthalmology: Effect of Image Recognition and Domain-Specific Pretraining on Diagnostic Performance

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: In recent years, the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence models, such as ChatGPT (version of 29 April 2024), have prompted interest from numerous domains of medicine, such as ophthalmology. As such, research is necessary to further assess its potential while simultaneously evaluating its shortcomings. Our study thus evaluates ChatGPT-4's performance on the American Academy of Ophthalmology's (AAO) Basic and Clinical Science Course (BCSC) Self-Assessment Program, focusing on its image recognition capabilities and its enhancement with domain-specific pretraining. <b>Methods</b>: The chatbot was tested on 1300 BCSC Self-Assessment Program questions, including text and image-based questions. Domain-specific pretraining was tested for performance improvements. The primary outcome was the model's accuracy when presented with text and image-based multiple choice questions. Logistic regression and post hoc analyzes examined performance variations by question difficulty, image presence, and subspecialties. <b>Results</b>: The chatbot achieved an average accuracy of 78% compared with the average test-taker score of 74%. The repeatability kappa was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.87). Following domain-specific pretraining, the model's overall accuracy increased to 85%. The accuracy of the model's responses first depends on question difficulty (LR = 366), followed by image presence (LR = 108) and exam section (LR = 79). <b>Conclusions</b>: The chatbot appeared to be similar or superior to human trainee test takers in ophthalmology, even with image recognition questions. Domain-specific training appeared to have improved accuracy. While these results do not necessarily imply that the chatbot has the comprehensive skill level of a human ophthalmologist, the results suggest there may be educational value to these tools if additional investigations provide similar results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141820
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Plus in Ophthalmology: Effect of Image Recognition and Domain-Specific Pretraining on Diagnostic Performance

Kevin Y. Wu, Shuixian Qian, Michael Marchand
1 citations
Diagnostics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Plus in Ophthalmology: Effect of Image Recognition and Domain-Specific Pretraining on Diagnostic Performance

Kevin Y. Wu, Shuixian Qian, Michael Marchand
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: In recent years, the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence models, such as ChatGPT (version of 29 April 2024), have prompted interest from numerous domains of medicine, such as ophthalmology. As such, research is necessary to further assess its potential while simultaneously evaluating its shortcomings. Our study thus evaluates ChatGPT-4's performance on the American Academy of Ophthalmology's (AAO) Basic and Clinical Science Course (BCSC) Self-Assessment Program, focusing on its image recognition capabilities and its enhancement with domain-specific pretraining. <b>Methods</b>: The chatbot was tested on 1300 BCSC Self-Assessment Program questions, including text and image-based questions. Domain-specific pretraining was tested for performance improvements. The primary outcome was the model's accuracy when presented with text and image-based multiple choice questions. Logistic regression and post hoc analyzes examined performance variations by question difficulty, image presence, and subspecialties. <b>Results</b>: The chatbot achieved an average accuracy of 78% compared with the average test-taker score of 74%. The repeatability kappa was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.87). Following domain-specific pretraining, the model's overall accuracy increased to 85%. The accuracy of the model's responses first depends on question difficulty (LR = 366), followed by image presence (LR = 108) and exam section (LR = 79). <b>Conclusions</b>: The chatbot appeared to be similar or superior to human trainee test takers in ophthalmology, even with image recognition questions. Domain-specific training appeared to have improved accuracy. While these results do not necessarily imply that the chatbot has the comprehensive skill level of a human ophthalmologist, the results suggest there may be educational value to these tools if additional investigations provide similar results.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(14)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.