Diagnostic Accuracy and Interrater Agreement of FDG-PET/CT Lymph Node Staging in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: The SENTIREC-Endo Study
<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The SENTIREC-endo study identified a safe sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm combined with PET-positive node dissection, matching radical pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer. The present study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for lymph node metastases in the same population based on location, size, and Standardised Uptake Value (SUV), in addition to assessing interrater agreement across three Danish centres. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective multicentre study included women with high-risk endometrial cancer from the Danish SENTIREC study database (2017-2023). All patients underwent preoperative FDG-PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated against a pathology-confirmed reference standard. Interrater agreement was evaluated between trained specialists in Nuclear Medicine. <b>Results:</b> Among 227 patients, 52 patients (23%) had lymph node metastases. FDG-PET/CT identified lymph node metastases with 56% sensitivity (95% CI: 42-68) and 91% specificity (95% CI: 86-94). Positive and negative predictive values were 64% and 87%, respectively. Specificity for paraaortic nodes was high (97%), though sensitivity remained limited (56%). Lymph node size and SUVmax had moderate diagnostic value (AUC-ROC ~0.7). Interrater proportion of agreement was 95% and Cohen's Kappa κ = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.94), the latter of which was 'almost perfect'. <b>Conclusions:</b> FDG-PET/CT had limited sensitivity in lymph node staging in high-risk EC, and the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT remains complementary to the sentinel node procedure. Due to its high specificity and strong interrater reliability, FDG-PET/CT is recommended for clinical implementation in combination with the sensitive sentinel node biopsy for the targeted dissection of PET-positive lymph nodes, particularly in paraaortic regions.
Authors
- Pernille Tine Jensen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-6040)
- Oke Gerke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6335-3303)
- André H. Dias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3184-3468)
- Mie Holm Vilstrup (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-0068)
- Kirsten Bouchelouche (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-8794)
- Sara Elisabeth Sponholtz
- Sarah Marie Bjørnholt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9654-7876)
- Jorun Holm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3607-8232)
- Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-9018)
- Kirsten Jochumsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2758-9332)
- Annika Loft
Institutions
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Hospital South West Jutland (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cancers
- Published
- 2025-07-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142396
- Primary Topic
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Aarhus Universitet
- Aarhus Universitetshospital
- Odense Universitetshospital