Dynamic and living devices for overcoming fibrosis of implanted biomaterials

Abstract The fibrotic encapsulation of implantable medical devices reduces diffusion‐based mass transport and electrical conductivity between the tissue and implant, limiting many devices to weeks‐long rather than years‐long lifetimes. Most strategies to overcome fibrosis take a passive, materials‐driven approach to mitigate the chemical and mechanical mismatch at the tissue‐implant interface through superficial or structural implant modifications. Recent advancements in microfabrication and mechanotherapy have led engineers to incorporate smart and active mechanical actuation systems into implantable devices that use pressure, vibration, and integrated electronics to perpetually overcome effects of the foreign body response. Here, we highlight medical applications where active antifibrotic strategies outperform passive strategies in terms of device lifetimes and therapeutic outcomes, outline engineering design considerations for integrating active strategies, and discuss challenges in developing dynamic and living implants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.70048
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic and living devices for overcoming fibrosis of implanted biomaterials

Alex Abramson, Joy M. Jackson, Lolita Testu
3 citations
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
2.02
article

Dynamic and living devices for overcoming fibrosis of implanted biomaterials

Alex Abramson, Joy M. Jackson, Lolita Testu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The fibrotic encapsulation of implantable medical devices reduces diffusion‐based mass transport and electrical conductivity between the tissue and implant, limiting many devices to weeks‐long rather than years‐long lifetimes. Most strategies to overcome fibrosis take a passive, materials‐driven approach to mitigate the chemical and mechanical mismatch at the tissue‐implant interface through superficial or structural implant modifications. Recent advancements in microfabrication and mechanotherapy have led engineers to incorporate smart and active mechanical actuation systems into implantable devices that use pressure, vibration, and integrated electronics to perpetually overcome effects of the foreign body response. Here, we highlight medical applications where active antifibrotic strategies outperform passive strategies in terms of device lifetimes and therapeutic outcomes, outline engineering design considerations for integrating active strategies, and discuss challenges in developing dynamic and living implants.

Bioengineering & Translational MedicineVol. 11(2)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Emory University (US), The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering (US)
National Science Foundation, Georgia Institute of Technology, National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic and living devices for overcoming fibrosis of implanted biomaterials — Alex Abramson, Joy M. Jackson, et al. · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS