Power Assessment and Performance Comparison of Wind Turbines Driven by Multivariate Environmental Factors

The increasing deployment of turbines installed offshore is critical for sustainable energy development, yet accurate performance assessment remains challenging due to complex environmental influences, diverse turbine control strategies, and issues with data quality. Traditional performance metrics and power curve models often fail to provide reliable cross-turbine comparisons because they neglect multivariate environmental factors and turbine-specific biases. To address these limitations, this study develops a novel multivariate environmental factor-driven power assessment framework employing segmented long short-term memory (LSTM) models. A hybrid data cleaning method, combining bidirectional quartile analysis with the power curtailment detection, is proposed to effectively identify outliers, including subtle anomalies within typical data ranges. Samples are segmented based on rated wind speed to reflect differences in control strategies, and turbine-specific operational parameters are excluded to ensure unbiased comparisons among turbines. The proposed method achieves substantial improvements in predictive accuracy, with decreases of 9.39% in mean absolute error (MAE) and 11.75% in root mean square error (RMSE), compared to conventional binning approaches. When applied to three 5.5 MW offshore wind turbines, the proposed method reveals significant differences among the units. Turbine A demonstrates the highest performance, while turbines B and C exhibit reductions of 14.35% and 8.29%, respectively. Operational state analysis shows that turbine B experiences substantially longer maintenance durations, indicating severe faults that adversely affect its operational reliability and power output. These findings provide valuable insights for maintenance prioritization and performance benchmarking among wind turbines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071377
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power Assessment and Performance Comparison of Wind Turbines Driven by Multivariate Environmental Factors

Bubin Wang, Weihao Ji, Denghao Zhu, Bin Zhou et al.
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Power Assessment and Performance Comparison of Wind Turbines Driven by Multivariate Environmental Factors

Bubin Wang, Weihao Ji, Denghao Zhu, Bin Zhou, Mingheng Zou, Zhao Rao, Haoxuan Luo
article en

Abstract

The increasing deployment of turbines installed offshore is critical for sustainable energy development, yet accurate performance assessment remains challenging due to complex environmental influences, diverse turbine control strategies, and issues with data quality. Traditional performance metrics and power curve models often fail to provide reliable cross-turbine comparisons because they neglect multivariate environmental factors and turbine-specific biases. To address these limitations, this study develops a novel multivariate environmental factor-driven power assessment framework employing segmented long short-term memory (LSTM) models. A hybrid data cleaning method, combining bidirectional quartile analysis with the power curtailment detection, is proposed to effectively identify outliers, including subtle anomalies within typical data ranges. Samples are segmented based on rated wind speed to reflect differences in control strategies, and turbine-specific operational parameters are excluded to ensure unbiased comparisons among turbines. The proposed method achieves substantial improvements in predictive accuracy, with decreases of 9.39% in mean absolute error (MAE) and 11.75% in root mean square error (RMSE), compared to conventional binning approaches. When applied to three 5.5 MW offshore wind turbines, the proposed method reveals significant differences among the units. Turbine A demonstrates the highest performance, while turbines B and C exhibit reductions of 14.35% and 8.29%, respectively. Operational state analysis shows that turbine B experiences substantially longer maintenance durations, indicating severe faults that adversely affect its operational reliability and power output. These findings provide valuable insights for maintenance prioritization and performance benchmarking among wind turbines.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(7)
Southeast University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.