COMPARISON OF INVESTMENT APPEAL OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH PREFABRICATED-MONOLITHIC AND MONOLITHIC FRAME

With rising real estate prices and rising mortgage interest rates, housing is becoming less accessible to the public, and the issue of creating more affordable housing for the population is becoming more urgent. One of the most effective ways to solve this problem is to reduce the cost of building residential buildings without compromising quality and reliability. The choice of optimal construction technology plays a key role in this. Reducing the cost per square meter of a building under construction will affect the investment attractiveness of the project. This article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the investment attractiveness of residential buildings built using two different technologies: prefabricated monolithic (ARKOS frame) and monolithic. The paper discusses the fundamental solutions for the construction of two different types of frames, as well as key factors affecting investment attractiveness, such as construction time, construction cost, quality and durability of buildings, as well as investment risks. Based on quantitative and qualitative analysis, conclusions are drawn about the advantages and disadvantages of each technology from the investor's point of view. The results of the study can contribute to the development of the construction industry, contributing to the optimization of construction processes and improving the efficiency of investments in housing construction.