Assessing the Costs of Constructed Floating Wetlands for the Treatment of Surface Waters and Wastewater

The development of constructed floating wetlands (CFWs) as a nature-based solution for water treatment has progressed over the last 25 years. However, full-scale CFW adoption remains relatively limited due in part to the uncertainty regarding the costs of CFWs in terms of capital and operational expenditure (CAPEX and OPEX) and treatment capacity. This study reports on the costs of 11 international CFW schemes including the factors affecting CAPEX and OPEX and levelized costs of nitrogen and phosphorus removal. The estimated levelized CAPEX and OPEX ranged from US$15/m2 to $2537/m2 and from $0.5/m2 y–1 to $181/m2 y–1, respectively, for CFW schemes of 55–3926 m2. Data from six full-scale CFWs showed that the costs per kg of nitrogen removed ($10 to $120/kg) by plant uptake were consistently lower than those of phosphorus ($15 to $3250/kg). CFW scheme scale was found to be a key influencing factor on cost, with cost per kg of nitrogen and phosphorus removed declining as CFW size increased. Use of this cost information can be generalized when considering nutrient removal and adoption of CFW technology compared to other engineered treatment options worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00439
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Costs of Constructed Floating Wetlands for the Treatment of Surface Waters and Wastewater

Declan Page, Simon Beecham, Terry Lucke, Phil Nicodemus et al.
5 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
4.99
article

Assessing the Costs of Constructed Floating Wetlands for the Treatment of Surface Waters and Wastewater

Declan Page, Simon Beecham, Terry Lucke, Phil Nicodemus, William H.J. Strosnider, John Awad, Muhammad Arslan, Sarah A. White, Christopher D. Walker, J. van Leeuwen, Ryan J. Winston, C. Streb
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The development of constructed floating wetlands (CFWs) as a nature-based solution for water treatment has progressed over the last 25 years. However, full-scale CFW adoption remains relatively limited due in part to the uncertainty regarding the costs of CFWs in terms of capital and operational expenditure (CAPEX and OPEX) and treatment capacity. This study reports on the costs of 11 international CFW schemes including the factors affecting CAPEX and OPEX and levelized costs of nitrogen and phosphorus removal. The estimated levelized CAPEX and OPEX ranged from US$15/m2 to $2537/m2 and from $0.5/m2 y–1 to $181/m2 y–1, respectively, for CFW schemes of 55–3926 m2. Data from six full-scale CFWs showed that the costs per kg of nitrogen removed ($10 to $120/kg) by plant uptake were consistently lower than those of phosphorus ($15 to $3250/kg). CFW scheme scale was found to be a key influencing factor on cost, with cost per kg of nitrogen and phosphorus removed declining as CFW size increased. Use of this cost information can be generalized when considering nutrient removal and adoption of CFW technology compared to other engineered treatment options worldwide.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 5(8)
Charles River Laboratories (Netherlands) (NL), Baruch College (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of South Carolina (US), University of South Australia (AU), Urbana University (US), Geodetic Institute of Slovenia (SI), RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (JP), Health Sciences and Nutrition (AU), H.T. Harvey & Associates (US), Setshaba Research Centre (ZA), The Ohio State University (US), Clemson University (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.