Exploring the perspectives of chronic patients on the communication of bad news

Background. The communication of bad news is a critical clinical challenge that profoundly affects patient well-being and the physician-patient relationship. In cultural contexts such as Iran, where family involvement is paramount, patient preferences for this process are not well understood, representing a significant gap in patient-centered care. Methods. This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 at a tertiary hospital in Zahedan, Iran. We surveyed 120 chronic patients using a validated 30-item questionnaire to assess their perspectives on the communication of bad news. The convenience sample included patients aged 18 years and older. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. The sample comprised 76 (63.3%) males and 44 (36.7%) females, with a mean age of 56.5 ± 10.6 years. A majority of patients (73.3%) believed they should be fully informed about adverse news, and all respondents (100%) agreed or were neutral about the essential role of a psychological counselor. However, 76.7% reported that receiving bad news from a physician led to negative perceptions of that physician. Consequently, only 26.7% agreed that a specialist physician is the most suitable person to deliver such news. Conclusion. Chronic patients in this Iranian cohort express a strong desire for full disclosure but also indicate that the communication process itself can damage the physician-patient relationship. The findings underscore a critical need for systemic changes that go beyond physician training, including the guaranteed provision of privacy, routine integration of psychological support, and a family-inclusive approach to mitigate negative emotional impact and foster trust.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Romanian Journal of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37897/rjpp.2025.2.1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the perspectives of chronic patients on the communication of bad news

Nezarali Moulaei, Parnian Molaei, Reza Kordinezhad, Hamidreza Zivarifar
Romanian Journal of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Exploring the perspectives of chronic patients on the communication of bad news

Nezarali Moulaei, Parnian Molaei, Reza Kordinezhad, Hamidreza Zivarifar
article en

Abstract

Background. The communication of bad news is a critical clinical challenge that profoundly affects patient well-being and the physician-patient relationship. In cultural contexts such as Iran, where family involvement is paramount, patient preferences for this process are not well understood, representing a significant gap in patient-centered care. Methods. This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 at a tertiary hospital in Zahedan, Iran. We surveyed 120 chronic patients using a validated 30-item questionnaire to assess their perspectives on the communication of bad news. The convenience sample included patients aged 18 years and older. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. The sample comprised 76 (63.3%) males and 44 (36.7%) females, with a mean age of 56.5 ± 10.6 years. A majority of patients (73.3%) believed they should be fully informed about adverse news, and all respondents (100%) agreed or were neutral about the essential role of a psychological counselor. However, 76.7% reported that receiving bad news from a physician led to negative perceptions of that physician. Consequently, only 26.7% agreed that a specialist physician is the most suitable person to deliver such news. Conclusion. Chronic patients in this Iranian cohort express a strong desire for full disclosure but also indicate that the communication process itself can damage the physician-patient relationship. The findings underscore a critical need for systemic changes that go beyond physician training, including the guaranteed provision of privacy, routine integration of psychological support, and a family-inclusive approach to mitigate negative emotional impact and foster trust.

Romanian Journal of Psychiatry & PsychotherapyVol. 27(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.