The Utility of CRT: Analyzing Systemic Issues in Community and Technical Colleges

ABSTRACT This paper examines the underutilization of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in addressing systemic racial inequities within community and technical colleges (CTCs). We argue that while diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are prevalent, CRT offers a more robust framework for understanding and dismantling systemic racism. We analyze existing literature and highlight a scarcity of research applying CRT to CTCs, particularly concerning national support organizations lack of resources naming CRT in lieu of DEI, inequitable DEI labor distribution, faculty buy‐in, and curriculum development. We propose practical strategies for integrating CRT into institutional practices and national support organization efforts to promote more effective and lasting racial equity. Ultimately, we advocate for a more explicit and transparent use of CRT alongside DEI to achieve meaningful change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Community Colleges
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.70006
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Utility of CRT: Analyzing Systemic Issues in Community and Technical Colleges

Yuritzi E. Lozano, Tenisha L. Tevis, Danielle Hoffman, Jason Boatwright
1 links
New Directions for Community Colleges
Higher Education Research Studies
article

The Utility of CRT: Analyzing Systemic Issues in Community and Technical Colleges

Yuritzi E. Lozano, Tenisha L. Tevis, Danielle Hoffman, Jason Boatwright
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the underutilization of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in addressing systemic racial inequities within community and technical colleges (CTCs). We argue that while diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are prevalent, CRT offers a more robust framework for understanding and dismantling systemic racism. We analyze existing literature and highlight a scarcity of research applying CRT to CTCs, particularly concerning national support organizations lack of resources naming CRT in lieu of DEI, inequitable DEI labor distribution, faculty buy‐in, and curriculum development. We propose practical strategies for integrating CRT into institutional practices and national support organization efforts to promote more effective and lasting racial equity. Ultimately, we advocate for a more explicit and transparent use of CRT alongside DEI to achieve meaningful change.

New Directions for Community CollegesVol. 2025(209-210)
Oregon State University (US), Clover Park Technical College (US), GC Systems (United States) (US), Pierce College (US), Clackamas Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.