Recursive Annotation for Negative Labeling in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping

Abstract Data engineering is a challenge in mineral prospectivity mapping using supervised data-driven methods because of a general paucity of true samples, both positive and negative. Naïve random sampling of unlabeled samples as presumptive negative samples is a common method, but it creates label crossover, which is the condition that otherwise true positives would be reversed in class designation. For mineral prospectivity mapping, label crossover has two main effects: (1) it artificially decreases the area of positive prospectivity because label crossover is asymmetrical; and (2) it increases model variance by increasing model complexity and, therefore, weakens the spatial continuity of predictions. These effects reduce the realism and trustworthiness of spatial analytic products (e.g., maps), which hinders their adoption. Here, we propose a data-driven and recursive annotation method based on positive and unlabeled learning to annotate negative samples. Our method progressively biases the negative labeling of unlabeled samples using prospectivity scores (as a class prior). The optimization of the number of recursions occurs through a joint maximization of the variable (aspatial) and spatial domain objectives of prospectivity mapping. Reducing label crossover improves the performance of a deep ensemble (of unique workflows) and increases spatial continuity of the resulting prospectivity map. Only two iterations of annotation were necessary for the refinement of a graphite prospectivity map in Canada. By its design, recursive annotation is broadly compatible with a range of workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Resources Research
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10510-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recursive Annotation for Negative Labeling in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping

Aaron Thompson, Steven E. Zhang, Mohammad Parsa, Daniel S. Coutts et al.
1 citations
Natural Resources Research
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Recursive Annotation for Negative Labeling in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping

Aaron Thompson, Steven E. Zhang, Mohammad Parsa, Daniel S. Coutts, Renato Cumani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Data engineering is a challenge in mineral prospectivity mapping using supervised data-driven methods because of a general paucity of true samples, both positive and negative. Naïve random sampling of unlabeled samples as presumptive negative samples is a common method, but it creates label crossover, which is the condition that otherwise true positives would be reversed in class designation. For mineral prospectivity mapping, label crossover has two main effects: (1) it artificially decreases the area of positive prospectivity because label crossover is asymmetrical; and (2) it increases model variance by increasing model complexity and, therefore, weakens the spatial continuity of predictions. These effects reduce the realism and trustworthiness of spatial analytic products (e.g., maps), which hinders their adoption. Here, we propose a data-driven and recursive annotation method based on positive and unlabeled learning to annotate negative samples. Our method progressively biases the negative labeling of unlabeled samples using prospectivity scores (as a class prior). The optimization of the number of recursions occurs through a joint maximization of the variable (aspatial) and spatial domain objectives of prospectivity mapping. Reducing label crossover improves the performance of a deep ensemble (of unique workflows) and increases spatial continuity of the resulting prospectivity map. Only two iterations of annotation were necessary for the refinement of a graphite prospectivity map in Canada. By its design, recursive annotation is broadly compatible with a range of workflows.

Natural Resources ResearchVol. 34(5)
Natural Resources Canada (CA), Geological Survey of Canada (CA)
Natural Resources Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.