Unpacking Side‐Selling: Experimental Evidence From Rural Mexico

ABSTRACT With the rise of market‐led development, marketing cooperatives have emerged that offer smallholder producers a guaranteed minimum price for their cash crops. Their existence is threatened when members side‐sell a part of their harvest to outside buyers. We conduct a framed field experiment with indigenous coffee producers in southern Mexico to examine the effect of four factors on the marketing decision: additional income, the presence of microcredit and/or technical assistance, average outside buyer price, and harvest quantity. Our results show that participants allocate on average 82% of their harvest to the certain‐price buyer. Changes in harvest quantity and outside‐buyer price have minimal effects. The offer of complementary services has a null effect. Moreover, 22% of the participants always allocate their entire harvest to the certain‐price buyer. Extra income increases this probability by 10%. Subgroup analysis reveals that this effect is limited to existing cooperative members.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70051
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking Side‐Selling: Experimental Evidence From Rural Mexico

Chris M. Boyd, Stephen Pitts S. J., Grant X. Storer
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Unpacking Side‐Selling: Experimental Evidence From Rural Mexico

Chris M. Boyd, Stephen Pitts S. J., Grant X. Storer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the rise of market‐led development, marketing cooperatives have emerged that offer smallholder producers a guaranteed minimum price for their cash crops. Their existence is threatened when members side‐sell a part of their harvest to outside buyers. We conduct a framed field experiment with indigenous coffee producers in southern Mexico to examine the effect of four factors on the marketing decision: additional income, the presence of microcredit and/or technical assistance, average outside buyer price, and harvest quantity. Our results show that participants allocate on average 82% of their harvest to the certain‐price buyer. Changes in harvest quantity and outside‐buyer price have minimal effects. The offer of complementary services has a null effect. Moreover, 22% of the participants always allocate their entire harvest to the certain‐price buyer. Extra income increases this probability by 10%. Subgroup analysis reveals that this effect is limited to existing cooperative members.

Agricultural EconomicsVol. 56(6)
Marquette University (US), Towson University (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Boston College, University of Minnesota, Loyola University Chicago, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Fordham University
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unpacking Side‐Selling: Experimental Evidence From Rural Mexico — Chris M. Boyd, Stephen Pitts S. J., et al. · Agricultural Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS