The agrarian question as a factor of political struggle in Russia during the Civil war: The dilemma of the White movement

Relevance . This article is devoted to a key and at the same time insufficiently studied historical aspect - the analysis of the agrarian policy of the White movement during the Civil War in Russia. In conditions when the peasantry constituted the majority of the population, the agrarian question determined the political loyalty of the masses. Studying the approaches of the White movement to solving the land issue allows us to understand the reasons for its defeat and identify strategic miscalculations, as well as assess the impact of agrarian policy on socio-political processes in Russia. Purpose . Based on a comprehensive analysis of historical sources and historiographic data, is to identify and systematize the main contradictions in the agrarian policy of the White movement during the Civil War in Russia. Objectives : analysis of the main approaches to solving the agrarian question among various political forces within the White movement; study of the evolution of the agrarian policy of the White movement at various stages of the Civil War. Methodology . In the article, historiographic, comparative-historical and problem-chronological methods were used to analyze the evolution of the White movement's agrarian policy. Results. The study identified key contradictions in the White movement's agrarian policy and assessed their impact on relations with the peasantry during the Civil War. The analysis of historiography showed the evolution of the approaches of the White governments: from restoration tendencies and postponing decisions to compromises and, finally, to an attempt at radical reform. The study confirmed that the inability of the Whites to resolve the agrarian issue and ignoring the interests of the peasantry became one of the key reasons for their defeat. Conclusions . The conducted research revealed that the agrarian policy of the White movement, evolving from restoration tendencies to attempts at reform, was characterized by inconsistency and belatedness. This inability to resolve the agrarian question, ignoring the interests of the peasantry and, as a result, the inability to enlist its support, were one of the key reasons for the defeat of the White movement in the Civil War. This historical experience emphasizes the exceptional importance of taking into account the agrarian question for any political force striving for success in Russia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-3-270-283
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The agrarian question as a factor of political struggle in Russia during the Civil war: The dilemma of the White movement

A. A. Kolupaev
Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

The agrarian question as a factor of political struggle in Russia during the Civil war: The dilemma of the White movement

A. A. Kolupaev
article en

Abstract

Relevance . This article is devoted to a key and at the same time insufficiently studied historical aspect - the analysis of the agrarian policy of the White movement during the Civil War in Russia. In conditions when the peasantry constituted the majority of the population, the agrarian question determined the political loyalty of the masses. Studying the approaches of the White movement to solving the land issue allows us to understand the reasons for its defeat and identify strategic miscalculations, as well as assess the impact of agrarian policy on socio-political processes in Russia. Purpose . Based on a comprehensive analysis of historical sources and historiographic data, is to identify and systematize the main contradictions in the agrarian policy of the White movement during the Civil War in Russia. Objectives : analysis of the main approaches to solving the agrarian question among various political forces within the White movement; study of the evolution of the agrarian policy of the White movement at various stages of the Civil War. Methodology . In the article, historiographic, comparative-historical and problem-chronological methods were used to analyze the evolution of the White movement's agrarian policy. Results. The study identified key contradictions in the White movement's agrarian policy and assessed their impact on relations with the peasantry during the Civil War. The analysis of historiography showed the evolution of the approaches of the White governments: from restoration tendencies and postponing decisions to compromises and, finally, to an attempt at radical reform. The study confirmed that the inability of the Whites to resolve the agrarian issue and ignoring the interests of the peasantry became one of the key reasons for their defeat. Conclusions . The conducted research revealed that the agrarian policy of the White movement, evolving from restoration tendencies to attempts at reform, was characterized by inconsistency and belatedness. This inability to resolve the agrarian question, ignoring the interests of the peasantry and, as a result, the inability to enlist its support, were one of the key reasons for the defeat of the White movement in the Civil War. This historical experience emphasizes the exceptional importance of taking into account the agrarian question for any political force striving for success in Russia.

Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and LawVol. 15(3)
Southwest Minnesota State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.