The Determination of Ṭalāq Timing: A Comparative Study Between the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Shafi’i School Scholars

This study examines the differences in the determination of the timing of ṭalāq between the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI)—as a codified representation of Islamic law in Indonesia and the views of classical scholars, particularly those of the Shafi’i school. The focus of the study lies in how each legal system defines the moment when ṭalāq is considered valid and legally effective, as well as its legal implications on the rights of husbands and wives and the integrity of the family institution. This research adopts a juridical-normative approach and applies a descriptive-analytical method, drawing from literature reviews of classical fiqh texts, statutory regulations, and relevant scholarly journals. The findings indicate that, according to the Shafi’i school, ṭalāq is considered to take effect immediately upon the husband’s pronouncement of a valid ṭalāq, whether expressed explicitly (ṣarīḥ), which requires no accompanying intention, or implicitly (kināyah), which must be accompanied by intent. In this context, the legal effect of ṭalāq does not depend on court proceedings or administrative registration; rather, it hinges on the husband’s verbal expression and intention as the substantive conditions for validity. Conversely, under the KHI, ṭalāq is only deemed valid if it is formally declared by the husband before a panel of judges during a Religious Court session. Any ṭalāq pronounced outside this official mechanism, such as privately or informally, has no legal standing, even if stated verbally by the husband. This divergence reflects a shift in legal paradigms: from a substantive-textual approach in classical jurisprudence to a formal-procedural approach in contemporary, institutionalized Islamic law. The KHI emphasizes women’s protection and legal certainty within the household, while the Shafi’i school focuses more on the authority of the husband and the spiritual-legal meaning of ṭalāq. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of harmonizing classical fiqh values with the demands of modern legal frameworks, ensuring that Islamic law remains contextual, just, and responsive to the evolving dynamics of contemporary society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MAQASIDI Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v5i1.4680
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Determination of Ṭalāq Timing: A Comparative Study Between the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Shafi’i School Scholars

Imron Choeri, Alfi Alfi, Amrina Rosyad
MAQASIDI Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Islamic Studies and History
article

The Determination of Ṭalāq Timing: A Comparative Study Between the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Shafi’i School Scholars

Imron Choeri, Alfi Alfi, Amrina Rosyad
article en

Abstract

This study examines the differences in the determination of the timing of ṭalāq between the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI)—as a codified representation of Islamic law in Indonesia and the views of classical scholars, particularly those of the Shafi’i school. The focus of the study lies in how each legal system defines the moment when ṭalāq is considered valid and legally effective, as well as its legal implications on the rights of husbands and wives and the integrity of the family institution. This research adopts a juridical-normative approach and applies a descriptive-analytical method, drawing from literature reviews of classical fiqh texts, statutory regulations, and relevant scholarly journals. The findings indicate that, according to the Shafi’i school, ṭalāq is considered to take effect immediately upon the husband’s pronouncement of a valid ṭalāq, whether expressed explicitly (ṣarīḥ), which requires no accompanying intention, or implicitly (kināyah), which must be accompanied by intent. In this context, the legal effect of ṭalāq does not depend on court proceedings or administrative registration; rather, it hinges on the husband’s verbal expression and intention as the substantive conditions for validity. Conversely, under the KHI, ṭalāq is only deemed valid if it is formally declared by the husband before a panel of judges during a Religious Court session. Any ṭalāq pronounced outside this official mechanism, such as privately or informally, has no legal standing, even if stated verbally by the husband. This divergence reflects a shift in legal paradigms: from a substantive-textual approach in classical jurisprudence to a formal-procedural approach in contemporary, institutionalized Islamic law. The KHI emphasizes women’s protection and legal certainty within the household, while the Shafi’i school focuses more on the authority of the husband and the spiritual-legal meaning of ṭalāq. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of harmonizing classical fiqh values with the demands of modern legal frameworks, ensuring that Islamic law remains contextual, just, and responsive to the evolving dynamics of contemporary society.

MAQASIDI Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (ID), Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.