Using Action-Policy Testing in RL to Reduce the Number of Bugs

Reinforcement learning is becoming ever more prominent in solving combinatorial search problems, in particular ones where states are images. Prior work has devised action-policy testing methodology, that identifies so-called bug states where policy performance is sub-optimal. Here we show how to leverage this methodology during the RL process, using action-policy testing to find bugs and injecting those as alternate start states for the training runs. Running experiments across six 2D games, we find that our testing-guided training often achieves similar expected reward while reducing the number of bugs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v18i1.35990
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Action-Policy Testing in RL to Reduce the Number of Bugs

Hasan Ferit Enişer, Songtuan Lin, Maria Christakis, Jörg Hoffmann et al.
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

Using Action-Policy Testing in RL to Reduce the Number of Bugs

Hasan Ferit Enişer, Songtuan Lin, Maria Christakis, Jörg Hoffmann, Valentin Wüstholz, N. Müller, Anastasia Isychev, Isabel Valera
article en

Abstract

Reinforcement learning is becoming ever more prominent in solving combinatorial search problems, in particular ones where states are images. Prior work has devised action-policy testing methodology, that identifies so-called bug states where policy performance is sub-optimal. Here we show how to leverage this methodology during the RL process, using action-policy testing to find bugs and injecting those as alternate start states for the training runs. Running experiments across six 2D games, we find that our testing-guided training often achieves similar expected reward while reducing the number of bugs.

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial SearchVol. 18
TU Wien (AT), German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), ConsenSys (United States) (US), Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (DE), Saarland University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.