Position Paper: On the Impact of Direction-Selection in BAE*

BAE*, and the independently developed DIBBS, are state-of-the-art bidirectional heuristic search algorithms that exploit heuristic consistency to efficiently prove solution optimality. Historically, BAE* has been studied with various direction-selection policies, determining whether to expand the next state from the forward or backward search. However, some of these policies expand nodes with an f-value exceeding the optimal solution cost, C*, which clearly cannot be part of any optimal solution. In this position paper, we review direction-selection strategies in BAE* and bidirectional search more broadly, analyzing their impact on the behavior of the search. Additionally, we present a low-overhead solution that prevents the expansion of nodes with f > C* across all direction-selection strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v18i1.36000
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Position Paper: On the Impact of Direction-Selection in BAE*

Ariel Felner, Nathan Sturtevant, Shahaf Shperberg, Lior Siag
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Position Paper: On the Impact of Direction-Selection in BAE*

Ariel Felner, Nathan Sturtevant, Shahaf Shperberg, Lior Siag
article en

Abstract

BAE*, and the independently developed DIBBS, are state-of-the-art bidirectional heuristic search algorithms that exploit heuristic consistency to efficiently prove solution optimality. Historically, BAE* has been studied with various direction-selection policies, determining whether to expand the next state from the forward or backward search. However, some of these policies expand nodes with an f-value exceeding the optimal solution cost, C*, which clearly cannot be part of any optimal solution. In this position paper, we review direction-selection strategies in BAE* and bidirectional search more broadly, analyzing their impact on the behavior of the search. Additionally, we present a low-overhead solution that prevents the expansion of nodes with f > C* across all direction-selection strategies.

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial SearchVol. 18
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Turing Institute (GB), Intel (United States) (US), University of Alberta (CA)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Israel National Road Safety Authority, Israel Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.