Epistemological Misunderstandings and Polycentric Resistance: Dutch Colonial Interaction with the Minangkabau Society in the Early Padri Conflict (West Sumatra, 1819–1825)

In the early 19th century, Dutch colonial misinterpretations of Minangkabau society were not passive deficiencies but active instruments of resistance. Local communities strategically transformed colonial ignorance into autonomous spaces. This thesis reframes colonial narratives by highlighting polycentric agency—from coffee-hiding farmers to salt-innovating clerics—which systematically exploited Dutch epistemological blind spots. Thus, colonial failure was structural-epistemological, not merely technical-military; territorial occupation did not equate to political control. Consequently, the colonized Minangkabau society’s resilience oftenthe resilience of the colonized Minangkabau society often resided in its capacity to convert the colonizer’s weakness (ignorance) into a source of counter-hegemonic strength

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ceteris Paribus
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25077/jcp.v4i1.47
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemological Misunderstandings and Polycentric Resistance: Dutch Colonial Interaction with the Minangkabau Society in the Early Padri Conflict (West Sumatra, 1819–1825)

Yudhi Andoni, Novi Yulia
Jurnal Ceteris Paribus
Asian Studies and History
article

Epistemological Misunderstandings and Polycentric Resistance: Dutch Colonial Interaction with the Minangkabau Society in the Early Padri Conflict (West Sumatra, 1819–1825)

Yudhi Andoni, Novi Yulia
article en

Abstract

In the early 19th century, Dutch colonial misinterpretations of Minangkabau society were not passive deficiencies but active instruments of resistance. Local communities strategically transformed colonial ignorance into autonomous spaces. This thesis reframes colonial narratives by highlighting polycentric agency—from coffee-hiding farmers to salt-innovating clerics—which systematically exploited Dutch epistemological blind spots. Thus, colonial failure was structural-epistemological, not merely technical-military; territorial occupation did not equate to political control. Consequently, the colonized Minangkabau society’s resilience oftenthe resilience of the colonized Minangkabau society often resided in its capacity to convert the colonizer’s weakness (ignorance) into a source of counter-hegemonic strength

Jurnal Ceteris ParibusVol. 4(1)
Kinetic Art & Technology (United States) (US), Andalas University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.