Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on sex and gender documentation in electronic health records: an exploratory qualitative study of Sweden and China

Sex and gender, though often conflated in clinical settings, are distinct concepts that are essential for equitable healthcare. Despite the growing recognition of diverse gender identities, many healthcare information systems still adhere to a binary perspective. The lack of inclusive sex and gender documentation in electronic health records exacerbates healthcare inequities for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. This study investigated how healthcare professionals in Sweden and China currently document gender and sex in electronic health records, aiming to identify issues that could improve healthcare inclusiveness and equity. Fifteen interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals from Sweden and China, and a thematic analysis was applied to identify key themes. Six key themes were identified. Most participants observed that healthcare professionals prioritize patients’ sex over gender in patient communication due to limited gender-focused medical education, binary-based clinical procedures, and inadequate electronic health record fields for documenting sex and gender. They also noted that biased sociocultural and political context influence documentation practices, and may raise concerns about the privacy of patients’ gender information. This study identifies key challenges in sex/gender documentation within electronic health record systems, including binary-focused practices, electronic health record design limitations, educational training gaps, and sociocultural barriers. Despite recognizing its importance, healthcare providers face implementation challenges due to operational constraints and a lack of standardization. The findings highlight the need for electronic health record redesign, improved training, and policy reforms to ensure equitable, gender-affirming care while protecting patient privacy. Further research should explore implementation strategies across diverse healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2535077
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on sex and gender documentation in electronic health records: an exploratory qualitative study of Sweden and China

Stefano Bonacina, Nadia Davoody, Jiahe Chen
Critical Public Health
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on sex and gender documentation in electronic health records: an exploratory qualitative study of Sweden and China

Stefano Bonacina, Nadia Davoody, Jiahe Chen
article en

Abstract

Sex and gender, though often conflated in clinical settings, are distinct concepts that are essential for equitable healthcare. Despite the growing recognition of diverse gender identities, many healthcare information systems still adhere to a binary perspective. The lack of inclusive sex and gender documentation in electronic health records exacerbates healthcare inequities for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. This study investigated how healthcare professionals in Sweden and China currently document gender and sex in electronic health records, aiming to identify issues that could improve healthcare inclusiveness and equity. Fifteen interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals from Sweden and China, and a thematic analysis was applied to identify key themes. Six key themes were identified. Most participants observed that healthcare professionals prioritize patients’ sex over gender in patient communication due to limited gender-focused medical education, binary-based clinical procedures, and inadequate electronic health record fields for documenting sex and gender. They also noted that biased sociocultural and political context influence documentation practices, and may raise concerns about the privacy of patients’ gender information. This study identifies key challenges in sex/gender documentation within electronic health record systems, including binary-focused practices, electronic health record design limitations, educational training gaps, and sociocultural barriers. Despite recognizing its importance, healthcare providers face implementation challenges due to operational constraints and a lack of standardization. The findings highlight the need for electronic health record redesign, improved training, and policy reforms to ensure equitable, gender-affirming care while protecting patient privacy. Further research should explore implementation strategies across diverse healthcare settings.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Institute of Informatics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.