Charitable Oversight: Insight from Regulators and Enforcers

Abstract Charitable Oversight : Insight from Regulators and Enforcers , examines the critical role of state charity officials in oversight of the nonprofit sector within the United States, including current and anticipated challenges to their regulatory authority. As charitable giving and the number of nonprofit organizations in the U.S. continue to grow, effective regulation is essential to ensuring that donations to charity are used appropriately and for their intended charitable purposes. State charity regulators, who often operate with limited resources, are at the forefront of these efforts, working to detect and prevent fraud, mismanagement, and other violations of law. The article begins with a discussion of the educational initiatives undertaken by state regulators to address potential compliance issues within the charitable sector. By providing training and guidance to nonprofit boards and donors, regulators help ensure that nonprofit leaders are aware of their fiduciary responsibilities and that donors are informed about how to donate wisely. These educational efforts are essential tools in preventing fraud and enhancing accountability, particularly given the limited resources available for enforcement in many states. Enforcement strategies are another central focus of the article. Charity regulators often employ a blend of progressive-enforcement methods, such as inquiry letters or informal resolutions, and more formal actions, including lawsuits and multistate enforcement initiatives. The paper highlights the importance of multistate collaboration, which has enabled state charity regulators to leverage their combined resources to target wide-spread fraud and pursue comprehensive actions that might not be possible if each state acts alone. For example, enforcement cases, brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and multiple states against fraudulent charities and deceptive solicitations, have had broad, nationwide impact. The paper raises concerns about the limited capacity of the IRS to serve as an effective gatekeeper. The IRS’s adoption of Form 1023-EZ in 2014, intended to streamline the tax-exempt application process, has led to a sharp increase in the number of organizations granted tax-exempt status, yet with fewer controls to verify their eligibility. For example, a substantial percentage of organizations using Form 1023-EZ may not actually qualify for the tax-exempt status they receive, creating added regulatory burdens for state charity officials who must monitor compliance with their limited resources. The article also addresses how technological advancements are reshaping the landscape of charitable giving and regulation. Digital platforms, crowdfunding sites, social media, and the growing popularity of online donation portals have made fundraising more accessible but also present new regulatory challenges. Regulators are increasingly faced with questions about the applicability of traditional laws to digital fundraising methods, the risks associated with online payment platforms, and the potential for AI-driven fraudulent solicitations that can manipulate donors with personalized, deceptive messages. Future challenges in the regulatory environment include the expected increase in the number of charitable organizations, an increasingly globalized solicitation landscape and social and environmental factors that result in more frequent disaster-related giving. The article argues that these changes will require regulators to expand multistate collaboration and develop more efficient systems for information sharing, cross-jurisdictional investigations, and collective enforcement actions. In conclusion, the authors advocate for expanded educational outreach and a strengthened network of collaboration among state charity regulators as essential to sustaining effective oversight of the nonprofit sector. By fostering a culture of compliance through education and leveraging collective resources for enforcement, state charity regulators can better protect donors, ensure transparency, and promote the health and integrity of the charitable sector in the United States. The article suggests that, with continued adaptation to technological and societal changes and more collaboration, charity regulators can effectively navigate the future challenges facing nonprofit oversight, safeguarding both public trust and charitable missions in an evolving landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Policy Forum
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2024-0029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charitable Oversight: Insight from Regulators and Enforcers

Lou Atkins, H. Ted Rubin, Jonathan H. Green, Josaphine Yuzuik et al.
1 citations
Nonprofit Policy Forum
Religion, Society, and Development
4.20
article

Charitable Oversight: Insight from Regulators and Enforcers

Lou Atkins, H. Ted Rubin, Jonathan H. Green, Josaphine Yuzuik, Karin Kunstler Goldman, Brien Winfield Heckman, Janet M. Kleinfelter, Beth Short, Tracy Thorleifson, Heather L. Weigler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Charitable Oversight : Insight from Regulators and Enforcers , examines the critical role of state charity officials in oversight of the nonprofit sector within the United States, including current and anticipated challenges to their regulatory authority. As charitable giving and the number of nonprofit organizations in the U.S. continue to grow, effective regulation is essential to ensuring that donations to charity are used appropriately and for their intended charitable purposes. State charity regulators, who often operate with limited resources, are at the forefront of these efforts, working to detect and prevent fraud, mismanagement, and other violations of law. The article begins with a discussion of the educational initiatives undertaken by state regulators to address potential compliance issues within the charitable sector. By providing training and guidance to nonprofit boards and donors, regulators help ensure that nonprofit leaders are aware of their fiduciary responsibilities and that donors are informed about how to donate wisely. These educational efforts are essential tools in preventing fraud and enhancing accountability, particularly given the limited resources available for enforcement in many states. Enforcement strategies are another central focus of the article. Charity regulators often employ a blend of progressive-enforcement methods, such as inquiry letters or informal resolutions, and more formal actions, including lawsuits and multistate enforcement initiatives. The paper highlights the importance of multistate collaboration, which has enabled state charity regulators to leverage their combined resources to target wide-spread fraud and pursue comprehensive actions that might not be possible if each state acts alone. For example, enforcement cases, brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and multiple states against fraudulent charities and deceptive solicitations, have had broad, nationwide impact. The paper raises concerns about the limited capacity of the IRS to serve as an effective gatekeeper. The IRS’s adoption of Form 1023-EZ in 2014, intended to streamline the tax-exempt application process, has led to a sharp increase in the number of organizations granted tax-exempt status, yet with fewer controls to verify their eligibility. For example, a substantial percentage of organizations using Form 1023-EZ may not actually qualify for the tax-exempt status they receive, creating added regulatory burdens for state charity officials who must monitor compliance with their limited resources. The article also addresses how technological advancements are reshaping the landscape of charitable giving and regulation. Digital platforms, crowdfunding sites, social media, and the growing popularity of online donation portals have made fundraising more accessible but also present new regulatory challenges. Regulators are increasingly faced with questions about the applicability of traditional laws to digital fundraising methods, the risks associated with online payment platforms, and the potential for AI-driven fraudulent solicitations that can manipulate donors with personalized, deceptive messages. Future challenges in the regulatory environment include the expected increase in the number of charitable organizations, an increasingly globalized solicitation landscape and social and environmental factors that result in more frequent disaster-related giving. The article argues that these changes will require regulators to expand multistate collaboration and develop more efficient systems for information sharing, cross-jurisdictional investigations, and collective enforcement actions. In conclusion, the authors advocate for expanded educational outreach and a strengthened network of collaboration among state charity regulators as essential to sustaining effective oversight of the nonprofit sector. By fostering a culture of compliance through education and leveraging collective resources for enforcement, state charity regulators can better protect donors, ensure transparency, and promote the health and integrity of the charitable sector in the United States. The article suggests that, with continued adaptation to technological and societal changes and more collaboration, charity regulators can effectively navigate the future challenges facing nonprofit oversight, safeguarding both public trust and charitable missions in an evolving landscape.

Nonprofit Policy ForumVol. 17(1-2)
United States Department of Justice (US), Office of the Attorney General (US), Office of the Attorney General (US), Tennessee State University (US), Federal Trade Commission (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Religion, Society, and Development
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.