Comparison of three launch monitors assessment of driver performance

This investigation examined driver performance across three commercially available golf launch monitor devices. Each of 13 female NCAA Division I golfers performed five swings with their driver. Each swing was analyzed concurrently by the three devices outdoors. A total of six metrics were assessed across the three devices. Significant differences were present for all six variables assessed in this investigation. Statistically significant differences were seen between each device for clubhead speed, carry distance, smash factor, and launch angle ( p < 0.05). Trackman values were significantly different than both Flightscope models for ball speed and spin rate with no differences between Flightscope models. Near-perfect correlations were present between devices for ball speed (r = 0.99). Very large significant correlations were present between devices for clubhead speed (r = 0.78–0.89), and large significant correlations were present between devices for carry distance (r = 0.61–0.66). Smash factor displayed the highest level of agreement across devices (mean bias −0.05 to 0.03), while spin rate displayed the poorest agreement across the three devices (mean bias 73.67–641.90) with the highest spin rates coming from the Mevo. Though significant correlations were present for several metrics, the statistically significant differences among all metrics suggest that golf practitioners should use caution when comparing data obtained across different launch monitor devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371251355674
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of three launch monitors assessment of driver performance

Paul T. Donahue, Jaclyn Simpson, Juliana Moore, John C. Garner et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Comparison of three launch monitors assessment of driver performance

Paul T. Donahue, Jaclyn Simpson, Juliana Moore, John C. Garner, Madeline R. Klubertanz, Minali G. Patton
article en

Abstract

This investigation examined driver performance across three commercially available golf launch monitor devices. Each of 13 female NCAA Division I golfers performed five swings with their driver. Each swing was analyzed concurrently by the three devices outdoors. A total of six metrics were assessed across the three devices. Significant differences were present for all six variables assessed in this investigation. Statistically significant differences were seen between each device for clubhead speed, carry distance, smash factor, and launch angle ( p < 0.05). Trackman values were significantly different than both Flightscope models for ball speed and spin rate with no differences between Flightscope models. Near-perfect correlations were present between devices for ball speed (r = 0.99). Very large significant correlations were present between devices for clubhead speed (r = 0.78–0.89), and large significant correlations were present between devices for carry distance (r = 0.61–0.66). Smash factor displayed the highest level of agreement across devices (mean bias −0.05 to 0.03), while spin rate displayed the poorest agreement across the three devices (mean bias 73.67–641.90) with the highest spin rates coming from the Mevo. Though significant correlations were present for several metrics, the statistically significant differences among all metrics suggest that golf practitioners should use caution when comparing data obtained across different launch monitor devices.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Jackson Memorial Hospital (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), University of Southern Mississippi (US), University of West Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.