The impact of the 2020 diagnostic reference level revision and the development of national regulations on occupational radiation protection in medical facilities in Japan

This study examined the impact of revisions to the diagnostic reference levels and the Regulation on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards on radiation safety management in medical institutions by investigating changes in the awareness of occupational and medical radiation exposure and improvements in radiation protection. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 799 facilities with angiography or nuclear medicine departments and responses were obtained from 424 facilities. The results showed that nonuniform exposure assessments were conducted in 93% of the facilities. Following regulatory revision, protective measures were reassessed in many facilities, leading to the increased use of protective eyewear and lens dosimeters. Notably, the adoption rate of lens dosimeters reached approximately 60%, suggesting heightened concerns about lens exposure. After the publication of the 2020 Diagnostic Reference Levels, many medical institutions reviewed the exposure conditions, with approximately 90% of the CT facilities modifying their parameters. These findings indicate that regulatory changes have contributed to an increased awareness of radiation protection and the reinforcement of specific protective measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1587287
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of the 2020 diagnostic reference level revision and the development of national regulations on occupational radiation protection in medical facilities in Japan

Takakiyo Tsujiguchi, Masataka Narita, Tomoyuki Suzuki, Tomoe Ishikawa et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

The impact of the 2020 diagnostic reference level revision and the development of national regulations on occupational radiation protection in medical facilities in Japan

Takakiyo Tsujiguchi, Masataka Narita, Tomoyuki Suzuki, Tomoe Ishikawa, Hajime Sakamoto, Yasuyuki Takahashi, Takeshi Sasaki, Satoshi Arakida, Taiga Kanozawa
article en

Abstract

This study examined the impact of revisions to the diagnostic reference levels and the Regulation on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards on radiation safety management in medical institutions by investigating changes in the awareness of occupational and medical radiation exposure and improvements in radiation protection. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 799 facilities with angiography or nuclear medicine departments and responses were obtained from 424 facilities. The results showed that nonuniform exposure assessments were conducted in 93% of the facilities. Following regulatory revision, protective measures were reassessed in many facilities, leading to the increased use of protective eyewear and lens dosimeters. Notably, the adoption rate of lens dosimeters reached approximately 60%, suggesting heightened concerns about lens exposure. After the publication of the 2020 Diagnostic Reference Levels, many medical institutions reviewed the exposure conditions, with approximately 90% of the CT facilities modifying their parameters. These findings indicate that regulatory changes have contributed to an increased awareness of radiation protection and the reinforcement of specific protective measures.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
Hirosaki University (JP), Juntendo University Hospital (JP), Hakodate Central General Hospital (JP), Hirosaki University Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.