Green versus non-green technology innovation and environmental quality: Cointegration and counterfactual analysis

Despite growing interest in green innovation and green investment as solutions to climate change, existing literature largely examines these elements in isolation, overlooking their combined effects and the contrasting role of non-green technologies. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of both green and non-green technological innovations on carbon emissions in Canada, while incorporating the roles of green investment, institutional quality, and geopolitical risks. Using annual time series data from 1990 to 2023, the study employs a novel dynamic autoregressive distributed lag (DARDL) approach to explore the cointegrating and counterfactual relationships among these variables. The findings indicate that green innovation and green investment significantly enhance environmental quality by reducing carbon emissions. In contrast, non-green innovation, along with institutional quality and geopolitical risks, is associated with increased emissions and environmental degradation in the long run. Furthermore, the interactions among green and non-green innovations, as well as between green innovation and green investment, and non-green innovation and green investment, show negative links with carbon emissions. Additionally, a counterfactual analysis is conducted to assess the impact of ±1% and ±5% shocks from the independent variables on the dependent variable. To further validate the robustness of these findings, the study utilizes the Kernel-based Regularized Least Squares (KRLS) machine learning algorithm. Finally, the study discusses key policy implications based on the results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05486-4
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green versus non-green technology innovation and environmental quality: Cointegration and counterfactual analysis

Md. Atikur Rahaman, Md. Idris Ali, Mohammed Julfikar Ali
7 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
21.92
article

Green versus non-green technology innovation and environmental quality: Cointegration and counterfactual analysis

Md. Atikur Rahaman, Md. Idris Ali, Mohammed Julfikar Ali
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Despite growing interest in green innovation and green investment as solutions to climate change, existing literature largely examines these elements in isolation, overlooking their combined effects and the contrasting role of non-green technologies. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of both green and non-green technological innovations on carbon emissions in Canada, while incorporating the roles of green investment, institutional quality, and geopolitical risks. Using annual time series data from 1990 to 2023, the study employs a novel dynamic autoregressive distributed lag (DARDL) approach to explore the cointegrating and counterfactual relationships among these variables. The findings indicate that green innovation and green investment significantly enhance environmental quality by reducing carbon emissions. In contrast, non-green innovation, along with institutional quality and geopolitical risks, is associated with increased emissions and environmental degradation in the long run. Furthermore, the interactions among green and non-green innovations, as well as between green innovation and green investment, and non-green innovation and green investment, show negative links with carbon emissions. Additionally, a counterfactual analysis is conducted to assess the impact of ±1% and ±5% shocks from the independent variables on the dependent variable. To further validate the robustness of these findings, the study utilizes the Kernel-based Regularized Least Squares (KRLS) machine learning algorithm. Finally, the study discusses key policy implications based on the results.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Jiujiang University (CN), Green University of Bangladesh (BD), Presidency University (BD), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
21.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.