Assessing the impacts of gridded population model choice on degree of urbanisation metrics

Defining urban and rural areas is crucial for assessing the accessibility of services and opportunities that impact people worldwide. The Degree of Urbanisation framework, endorsed by the UN Statistical Commission, primarily uses population grids to classify areas through a harmonised, population-centric approach, enabling international comparisons. However, variations in the distribution of population counts at the grid-cell level across different population datasets can significantly influence the resulting patterns. We applied the Degree of Urbanisation to 16 countries in Africa and the Caribbean, using four population grids to evaluate these effects. It shows that differences primarily occur in the classification of urban cluster. On average, 27.5 % of the population falls into mixed classes, with 17.5 % in mixed rural and urban cluster areas and 7.8 % in mixed urban cluster and urban centre areas. Population grids that only model populations within satellite-detected settlements show limited disagreement, with mixed rural and urban cluster population classifications decreasing by 5.6 percentage points and mixed urban cluster and urban centre populations by 1.4. Population modelling approaches that distribute populations more broadly, including outside of detected built-up areas, substantially reduce settlement identifications, resulting in 42.3 % fewer urban centres and 66.2 % fewer dense urban clusters than the average across the study countries. Our analyses highlight the potential sensitivity of Degree of Urbanisation to gridded population modelling assumptions and provide guidance on its implementation. • Urban centres classified by DEGURBA are least affected by grid variation, especially when unconstrained datasets are excluded. • GHS-POP produces the most urban centres and dense clusters, capturing more fragmented or dispersed areas around urban cities. • Unconstrained models like WPU under-represent urban centres, often misclassifying urban cells as rural. • Using settlement-constrained grids in DEGURBA improves urban identification reliability and supports accurate cross-national analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106293
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impacts of gridded population model choice on degree of urbanisation metrics

Alessandro Sorichetta, Graeme Hornby, Marcello Schiavina, Andrew J. Tatem et al.
1 citations
Cities
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
1.11
article

Assessing the impacts of gridded population model choice on degree of urbanisation metrics

Alessandro Sorichetta, Graeme Hornby, Marcello Schiavina, Andrew J. Tatem, Maksym Bondarenko, Weixuan Fang, Lewis Dijkstra, Iyanuloluwa Olowe, Wenbin Zhang, D. R. Woods, J Maes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Defining urban and rural areas is crucial for assessing the accessibility of services and opportunities that impact people worldwide. The Degree of Urbanisation framework, endorsed by the UN Statistical Commission, primarily uses population grids to classify areas through a harmonised, population-centric approach, enabling international comparisons. However, variations in the distribution of population counts at the grid-cell level across different population datasets can significantly influence the resulting patterns. We applied the Degree of Urbanisation to 16 countries in Africa and the Caribbean, using four population grids to evaluate these effects. It shows that differences primarily occur in the classification of urban cluster. On average, 27.5 % of the population falls into mixed classes, with 17.5 % in mixed rural and urban cluster areas and 7.8 % in mixed urban cluster and urban centre areas. Population grids that only model populations within satellite-detected settlements show limited disagreement, with mixed rural and urban cluster population classifications decreasing by 5.6 percentage points and mixed urban cluster and urban centre populations by 1.4. Population modelling approaches that distribute populations more broadly, including outside of detected built-up areas, substantially reduce settlement identifications, resulting in 42.3 % fewer urban centres and 66.2 % fewer dense urban clusters than the average across the study countries. Our analyses highlight the potential sensitivity of Degree of Urbanisation to gridded population modelling assumptions and provide guidance on its implementation. • Urban centres classified by DEGURBA are least affected by grid variation, especially when unconstrained datasets are excluded. • GHS-POP produces the most urban centres and dense clusters, capturing more fragmented or dispersed areas around urban cities. • Unconstrained models like WPU under-represent urban centres, often misclassifying urban cells as rural. • Using settlement-constrained grids in DEGURBA improves urban identification reliability and supports accurate cross-national analysis.

CitiesVol. 166
University of Milan (IT), Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (BE), University of Bristol (GB), Leefmilieu Brussel (BE), Joint Research Centre (IT), University of Southampton (GB)
European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.