Evaluating the effectiveness of crisis support spaces in Queensland, Australia: a mixed-methods study

Safe Spaces offer a person-centred, non-clinical and welcoming place for adults experiencing a mental health crisis to seek support as an alternative to presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Queensland Health’s Crisis Support Spaces (CSS), which are a hospital-based Safe Space service that has been piloted in the state of Queensland in Australia. The research employed a mixed-methods design. Retrospective, de-identified program data was analysed from 2,235 consumers who accessed a CSS in Queensland during the period of 23/01/2021 to 31/10/2023. Outcome variables were computed using data from Queensland Health’s Consumer Integrated Mental Health and Addiction (CIMHA) and Emergency Data Collection (EDC) datasets. Within-groups t-tests were used to analyse pre- to post- intervention changes in psychological distress ratings, number of mental health related ED presentations and number of mental health related hospital admissions. In addition, 78 semi-structured interviews were undertaken with CSS consumers and carers, CSS staff and broader mental health system staff; these were analysed using applied thematic analysis. Consumers experienced a statistically significant, large sized reduction in psychological distress ratings at post-intervention (mean difference = -2.9; p <.001; d = 1.30). A statistically significant, large sized reduction was also observed in the number of mental health related hospital interventions at 6-months post-intervention for those consumers with a prior history of inpatient admissions (mean difference = -1.0; p <.001; d = 0.80). Furthermore, a statistically significant, small sized reduction was observed in mental health related emergency department (ED) presentations at 6-months post- intervention for those consumers with a prior history of ED presentations (mean difference = -0.8; p <.001; d = 0.37). Qualitative data provided insights into potential mechanisms through which the service may achieve its intended outcomes (e.g., providing a safe environment for consumers to de-escalate their psychological distress, teaching consumers skills to self-manage their mental health). The findings of this study provide mixed-methods evidence supportive of the effectiveness of CSS in helping consumers reduce their psychological distress and preventing mental health related ED presentations and hospital admissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-025-00678-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychiatric care and mental health services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the effectiveness of crisis support spaces in Queensland, Australia: a mixed-methods study

Danielle Postorivo, Meaghan E. Enright, Zoë E. Papinczak, Mikesh Patel et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Psychiatric care and mental health services
2.31
article

Evaluating the effectiveness of crisis support spaces in Queensland, Australia: a mixed-methods study

Danielle Postorivo, Meaghan E. Enright, Zoë E. Papinczak, Mikesh Patel, Harvey Whiteford, Zoe Rutherford, Hannah Roovers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Safe Spaces offer a person-centred, non-clinical and welcoming place for adults experiencing a mental health crisis to seek support as an alternative to presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Queensland Health’s Crisis Support Spaces (CSS), which are a hospital-based Safe Space service that has been piloted in the state of Queensland in Australia. The research employed a mixed-methods design. Retrospective, de-identified program data was analysed from 2,235 consumers who accessed a CSS in Queensland during the period of 23/01/2021 to 31/10/2023. Outcome variables were computed using data from Queensland Health’s Consumer Integrated Mental Health and Addiction (CIMHA) and Emergency Data Collection (EDC) datasets. Within-groups t-tests were used to analyse pre- to post- intervention changes in psychological distress ratings, number of mental health related ED presentations and number of mental health related hospital admissions. In addition, 78 semi-structured interviews were undertaken with CSS consumers and carers, CSS staff and broader mental health system staff; these were analysed using applied thematic analysis. Consumers experienced a statistically significant, large sized reduction in psychological distress ratings at post-intervention (mean difference = -2.9; p <.001; d = 1.30). A statistically significant, large sized reduction was also observed in the number of mental health related hospital interventions at 6-months post-intervention for those consumers with a prior history of inpatient admissions (mean difference = -1.0; p <.001; d = 0.80). Furthermore, a statistically significant, small sized reduction was observed in mental health related emergency department (ED) presentations at 6-months post- intervention for those consumers with a prior history of ED presentations (mean difference = -0.8; p <.001; d = 0.37). Qualitative data provided insights into potential mechanisms through which the service may achieve its intended outcomes (e.g., providing a safe environment for consumers to de-escalate their psychological distress, teaching consumers skills to self-manage their mental health). The findings of this study provide mixed-methods evidence supportive of the effectiveness of CSS in helping consumers reduce their psychological distress and preventing mental health related ED presentations and hospital admissions.

International Journal of Mental Health SystemsVol. 19(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), University of Washington (US), Park Centre for Mental Health (AU), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (US), Ipswich Hospital (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU), Seattle University (US)
Queensland Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Psychiatric care and mental health services
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.