Comparative Analysis of Animal Protection in China and Spain from a Cross-cultural Perspective

In an era where global ecological concerns are of utmost importance, animal protection has emerged as a critical issue. China and Spain, each with its own unique historical, cultural, and social characteristics, have taken different routes in promoting animal protection initiatives. This thesis aims to compare the current practices of the two countries, identify the underlying factors causing the differences, and offer constructive suggestions for the development of China’s animal welfare. Through an examination of policy frameworks, legal implementations, achievements, and enforcement challenges, the study explores the disparities originating from historical contexts, public awareness levels, cultural traditions, and professional training in educational systems. The research is significant as it broadens cross-cultural comparative studies and proposes practical measures to improve China’s legal mechanisms. It encourages a change in societal attitudes towards animal welfare and sets new academic directions for implementation strategies. By promoting ethical treatment standards, this work aims to prevent animal cruelty and contribute to the preservation of ecological balance and biodiversity. Ultimately, the comparative analysis is intended to support sustainable development goals through enhanced international cooperation in animal protection. The findings can help create more animal-friendly environments and strengthen global partnerships in this vital field. This academic endeavor strives to bridge policy gaps and foster mutual understanding between Eastern and Western approaches to animal welfare challenges.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Science
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2025.04.022
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Animal Protection in China and Spain from a Cross-cultural Perspective

Jianan Yan, Fanguang Kong
Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Science
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
article

Comparative Analysis of Animal Protection in China and Spain from a Cross-cultural Perspective

Jianan Yan, Fanguang Kong
article en

Abstract

In an era where global ecological concerns are of utmost importance, animal protection has emerged as a critical issue. China and Spain, each with its own unique historical, cultural, and social characteristics, have taken different routes in promoting animal protection initiatives. This thesis aims to compare the current practices of the two countries, identify the underlying factors causing the differences, and offer constructive suggestions for the development of China’s animal welfare. Through an examination of policy frameworks, legal implementations, achievements, and enforcement challenges, the study explores the disparities originating from historical contexts, public awareness levels, cultural traditions, and professional training in educational systems. The research is significant as it broadens cross-cultural comparative studies and proposes practical measures to improve China’s legal mechanisms. It encourages a change in societal attitudes towards animal welfare and sets new academic directions for implementation strategies. By promoting ethical treatment standards, this work aims to prevent animal cruelty and contribute to the preservation of ecological balance and biodiversity. Ultimately, the comparative analysis is intended to support sustainable development goals through enhanced international cooperation in animal protection. The findings can help create more animal-friendly environments and strengthen global partnerships in this vital field. This academic endeavor strives to bridge policy gaps and foster mutual understanding between Eastern and Western approaches to animal welfare challenges.

Journal of Humanities Arts and Social ScienceVol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.