“Nibbāna is the Cessation of Becoming”: An Analysis

This article examines the phrase “nibbāna is the cessation of becoming” (bhavanirodho nibbānaṃ) as it appears in Nikāya Buddhism. The term bhava is traslated as “becoming,” although other meanings such as “being” or “existence” are also possible. Becoming is used to describe the persistent notion of “self ” that arises due to clinging to the five aggregates. The belief in this “self ” is the primary cause of one’s continous saṃsāric existence. When an individual eliminates the notion of “self ” in relation to the five aggregates, suffering ceases, which is known as nibbāna. In this context, bhava is not present in someone who has attained enlightenment. This argument examines the commentarial interpretation of the phrase, which equates “the cessation of becoming” with “the cessation of the five aggregates.” The interpretation pertains to the final nibbāna of an arahant attained upon the dissolution of the five aggregates. However, this article emphasizes the attainment of nibbāna through the cessation of the persistent notion of “self ” with regard to the five aggregates. Many scholars in Buddhist traditions assert that bhava and saṃsāra are identical to the same threefold world system of sensuality, form, and formlessness. Beings are born and die again and again within these three realms, and liberation from rebirth signifies nibbāna. Nonetheless, as argued, once enlightenment is attained, bhava and saṃsāra no longer apply to an arahant since s/he has eliminated the notion of “self.” In this context, saṃsāra is characterized as the dynamic effectiveness of dependent co-arising that all conditional factors revolve together, and its beginning point remains undiscoverable and inconceivable. Therefore, one’s saṃsāric existence can only be defined as long as there is a belief in “self ” or “I.” This article contends that the attainment of nibbāna is experiential, showcasing diverse interpretations of nibbāna found in the suttas, in Pāli literature considered to come after the suttas, and among scholars.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16893/ijbtc.2025.06.35.1.191
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Nibbāna is the Cessation of Becoming”: An Analysis

Dipen BARUA
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

“Nibbāna is the Cessation of Becoming”: An Analysis

Dipen BARUA
article en

Abstract

This article examines the phrase “nibbāna is the cessation of becoming” (bhavanirodho nibbānaṃ) as it appears in Nikāya Buddhism. The term bhava is traslated as “becoming,” although other meanings such as “being” or “existence” are also possible. Becoming is used to describe the persistent notion of “self ” that arises due to clinging to the five aggregates. The belief in this “self ” is the primary cause of one’s continous saṃsāric existence. When an individual eliminates the notion of “self ” in relation to the five aggregates, suffering ceases, which is known as nibbāna. In this context, bhava is not present in someone who has attained enlightenment. This argument examines the commentarial interpretation of the phrase, which equates “the cessation of becoming” with “the cessation of the five aggregates.” The interpretation pertains to the final nibbāna of an arahant attained upon the dissolution of the five aggregates. However, this article emphasizes the attainment of nibbāna through the cessation of the persistent notion of “self ” with regard to the five aggregates. Many scholars in Buddhist traditions assert that bhava and saṃsāra are identical to the same threefold world system of sensuality, form, and formlessness. Beings are born and die again and again within these three realms, and liberation from rebirth signifies nibbāna. Nonetheless, as argued, once enlightenment is attained, bhava and saṃsāra no longer apply to an arahant since s/he has eliminated the notion of “self.” In this context, saṃsāra is characterized as the dynamic effectiveness of dependent co-arising that all conditional factors revolve together, and its beginning point remains undiscoverable and inconceivable. Therefore, one’s saṃsāric existence can only be defined as long as there is a belief in “self ” or “I.” This article contends that the attainment of nibbāna is experiential, showcasing diverse interpretations of nibbāna found in the suttas, in Pāli literature considered to come after the suttas, and among scholars.

International Journal of Buddhist Thought and CultureVol. 35(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Nibbāna is the Cessation of Becoming”: An Analysis — Dipen BARUA · International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS