Poverty Accounting and Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review

The paper is intended to be a systematic literature review (SLR) of the developing area of poverty accounting and measurement. It finds out how the old and the new methods think about and measure poverty, determines where ethical, philosophical, and accounting concepts fit in, and charts what all this means in terms of policy, institutional responsibility, and further inquiry. The paper is a synthesis of 118 scholarly and organizational publications released in 2020-2025. It recognizes the replacement of unidimensional income-dependent poverty measures with multidimensional concepts that take account of health, education, well-being and social inclusion. The results indicate an increased focus on moral reasoning, participatory paradigms, data justice, and the obligation of accountability in measures of poverty. It also reveals theoretical shortcomings in how reflexivity, normative ethics and institutional reporting can be incorporated into measurement frameworks. Thematic synthesis grouped results in twelve main areas, such as multidimensional poverty indices (MPIs), data shortcomings, governance systems, and useful implementations in open and corporate reporting.The review offers substantive recommendations to policymakers, development practitioners, educators, and institutions through proposing the hybrid ethically based metrics that would combine the objectivity with contextual validity and participatory validity. It places the arrival of poverty accounting in national budgets, ESG reporting and social impact assessment. In addition, the review facilitates moral and ethical literacy in the education programs to shape the future practitioners. The paper fits in the literature because it provides the interdisciplinary framework able to integrate accounting principles and ethical and philosophical aspects of measuring poverty. It is among the few SLRs that have included various SLRs- development economics; moral education; institutional reporting; and artificial intelligence in conceptualizing the operational and ethical aspects of poverty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting Studies
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2025.7.4.8
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poverty Accounting and Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review

Evans O. N. D. Ocansey, Emmanuel Kwame Peprah, Emmanuel Kwame Asirifi
Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting Studies
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Poverty Accounting and Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review

Evans O. N. D. Ocansey, Emmanuel Kwame Peprah, Emmanuel Kwame Asirifi
article en

Abstract

The paper is intended to be a systematic literature review (SLR) of the developing area of poverty accounting and measurement. It finds out how the old and the new methods think about and measure poverty, determines where ethical, philosophical, and accounting concepts fit in, and charts what all this means in terms of policy, institutional responsibility, and further inquiry. The paper is a synthesis of 118 scholarly and organizational publications released in 2020-2025. It recognizes the replacement of unidimensional income-dependent poverty measures with multidimensional concepts that take account of health, education, well-being and social inclusion. The results indicate an increased focus on moral reasoning, participatory paradigms, data justice, and the obligation of accountability in measures of poverty. It also reveals theoretical shortcomings in how reflexivity, normative ethics and institutional reporting can be incorporated into measurement frameworks. Thematic synthesis grouped results in twelve main areas, such as multidimensional poverty indices (MPIs), data shortcomings, governance systems, and useful implementations in open and corporate reporting.The review offers substantive recommendations to policymakers, development practitioners, educators, and institutions through proposing the hybrid ethically based metrics that would combine the objectivity with contextual validity and participatory validity. It places the arrival of poverty accounting in national budgets, ESG reporting and social impact assessment. In addition, the review facilitates moral and ethical literacy in the education programs to shape the future practitioners. The paper fits in the literature because it provides the interdisciplinary framework able to integrate accounting principles and ethical and philosophical aspects of measuring poverty. It is among the few SLRs that have included various SLRs- development economics; moral education; institutional reporting; and artificial intelligence in conceptualizing the operational and ethical aspects of poverty.

Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting StudiesVol. 7(4)
Valley View University (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.