Stiffness and Strength-Related Sustainability Assessment of Natural Fibers for Injection Molded Composites

The growing demand for sustainable materials has led to an increased interest in bio-based composites reinforced with natural fibers such as flax, hemp, kenaf, and sisal. This study presents a comparative sustainability assessment of these fibers, highlighting significant differences based on processing methods and fiber characteristics. Life cycle assessment (LCA) results show that flax tow, a by-product of textile flax production, has the lowest environmental impact under economic allocation. In contrast, the impact of sisal fiber varies greatly depending on the processing method: wet separation in Tanzania significantly increases water consumption and methane emissions, while dry extraction methods in Brazil reduce these impacts. An integrated tool has been developed to incorporate material performance metrics into sustainability assessments to improve sustainable material selection, addressing the “LCA paradox.” This property-specific assessment framework enables multidisciplinary collaboration and supports the development of environmentally optimized natural fiber composites for injection molding and other applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Natural Fibers
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2531372
Primary Topic
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stiffness and Strength-Related Sustainability Assessment of Natural Fibers for Injection Molded Composites

Matthias Finkbeiner, Jörg Müssig, Nikolay Minkov, K.E. Meyer et al.
Journal of Natural Fibers
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
article

Stiffness and Strength-Related Sustainability Assessment of Natural Fibers for Injection Molded Composites

Matthias Finkbeiner, Jörg Müssig, Nikolay Minkov, K.E. Meyer, Lawrence Schonfeld, Katharina Albrecht, Jan-Marten Sprenger
article en

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable materials has led to an increased interest in bio-based composites reinforced with natural fibers such as flax, hemp, kenaf, and sisal. This study presents a comparative sustainability assessment of these fibers, highlighting significant differences based on processing methods and fiber characteristics. Life cycle assessment (LCA) results show that flax tow, a by-product of textile flax production, has the lowest environmental impact under economic allocation. In contrast, the impact of sisal fiber varies greatly depending on the processing method: wet separation in Tanzania significantly increases water consumption and methane emissions, while dry extraction methods in Brazil reduce these impacts. An integrated tool has been developed to incorporate material performance metrics into sustainability assessments to improve sustainable material selection, addressing the “LCA paradox.” This property-specific assessment framework enables multidisciplinary collaboration and supports the development of environmentally optimized natural fiber composites for injection molding and other applications.

Journal of Natural FibersVol. 22(1)
Hochschule Bremen (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stiffness and Strength-Related Sustainability Assessment of Natural Fibers for Injection Molded Composites — Matthias Finkbeiner, Jörg Müssig, et al. · Journal of Natural Fibers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS