Language and/or memory: How to slice the domain-cake?

Historically, memory and language have been seen as separate cognitive functions and studied in isolation. To date, it remains an open question to what extent these cognitive domains are related. Here, we present the interdisciplinary discussions from the 42nd European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology around the central question of how we should see the relationship between the domains of language and memory. We discuss relevant empirical evidence from the fields of cognitive psychology, cognitive neuropsychology, and cognitive neuroscience and take a philosophical perspective on this central question, considering issues such as how to weigh different types of evidence and how to conceptualize the relationship between language and memory. We conclude that elucidating questions about the nature of the relationship between language and memory requires not only more empirical data, but also parallel conceptual development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Published
2025-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2025.2535037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language and/or memory: How to slice the domain-cake?

Christopher R. Madan, Jolien C. Francken, Vitória Piai
1 citations
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
article

Language and/or memory: How to slice the domain-cake?

Christopher R. Madan, Jolien C. Francken, Vitória Piai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Historically, memory and language have been seen as separate cognitive functions and studied in isolation. To date, it remains an open question to what extent these cognitive domains are related. Here, we present the interdisciplinary discussions from the 42nd European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology around the central question of how we should see the relationship between the domains of language and memory. We discuss relevant empirical evidence from the fields of cognitive psychology, cognitive neuropsychology, and cognitive neuroscience and take a philosophical perspective on this central question, considering issues such as how to weigh different types of evidence and how to conceptualize the relationship between language and memory. We conclude that elucidating questions about the nature of the relationship between language and memory requires not only more empirical data, but also parallel conceptual development.

Cognitive NeuropsychologyVol. 42(1-2)
University of Nottingham (GB), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Cambridge Cognition (United Kingdom) (GB), Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition (FR), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Language and/or memory: How to slice the domain-cake? — Christopher R. Madan, Jolien C. Francken, et al. · Cognitive Neuropsychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS