When the Servant Is Also Master: A Theory on the Dual Role of Public Managers

ABSTRACT Public managers at all levels of the political‐administrative hierarchy take on a dual role as both principal and agent simultaneously. Because of this dual role, it is relevant for public managers to maintain credibility with their agents and remain loyal to their principals. This article develops a theory arguing that public managers can approach their dual role in a given situation utilizing a strategy based on one of four ideal types: Squires prioritize loyalty, Chieftains prioritize credibility, Mavericks prioritize neither, while Diplomats prioritize both. The relative distribution of preferences and information among public managers, and their principals and agents determines the viability of utilizing each strategy in that situation. The article contributes with a theoretical framework that allows us to better understand and analyze the dual role of public managers. It also promotes a research agenda by outlining relevant situations to examine and potential implications of the theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70012
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the Servant Is Also Master: A Theory on the Dual Role of Public Managers

Mads Pieter van Luttervelt
Public Administration Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

When the Servant Is Also Master: A Theory on the Dual Role of Public Managers

Mads Pieter van Luttervelt
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public managers at all levels of the political‐administrative hierarchy take on a dual role as both principal and agent simultaneously. Because of this dual role, it is relevant for public managers to maintain credibility with their agents and remain loyal to their principals. This article develops a theory arguing that public managers can approach their dual role in a given situation utilizing a strategy based on one of four ideal types: Squires prioritize loyalty, Chieftains prioritize credibility, Mavericks prioritize neither, while Diplomats prioritize both. The relative distribution of preferences and information among public managers, and their principals and agents determines the viability of utilizing each strategy in that situation. The article contributes with a theoretical framework that allows us to better understand and analyze the dual role of public managers. It also promotes a research agenda by outlining relevant situations to examine and potential implications of the theory.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(6)
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When the Servant Is Also Master: A Theory on the Dual Role of Public Managers — Mads Pieter van Luttervelt · Public Administration Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS