Psychological safety of students with disabilities when using virtual technologies in physical education classes

<p><strong>Context and relevance</strong>. Within the framework of the UNESCO project “Education for All”, special educational projects will be developed for people with disabilities. Modern technologies, including virtual reality, are used to implement such programs. There is a need to assess the psychological safety of using such technologies. <strong>Hypothesis</strong>. Conducting physical education classes using virtual reality technologies for students with disabilities does not violate their psychological safety. <strong>Methods and materials</strong>. The study involved 140 college students, of whom 70 students had health restrictions (based on which they were exempted by the medical commission from basic physical education classes) and 70 healthy students. Students with health restrictions were divided into 2 groups by randomization: experimental and control, 35 people each. Methods: questionnaire “Emotional safety of the environment”, express diagnostics of psychological safety of the individual, questionnaire of the feeling of security, questionnaire “Quality of interpersonal relationships in the educational environment”, methods of mathematical statistics (U criterion Mann Whitney, T criterion Wilcoxon. Training was conducted with the experimental group, 4 lessons, 1 time per week, VR simulators were used: archery (VR: Mediaeval archery), games of Bowling and Darts, educational simulators Boxing and Swimming, a simulator of the game of volleyball and basketball (the All-in-one sports application), games with rackets (First Person Tennis). <strong>Results</strong>. No differences were found between students with disabilities and ordinary students in the indicators of the safety of the educational environment and the feeling of security. 2 differences were found in the scales of safety of relationships: increased conflict with adults and decreased tolerance with peers. In the process of physical education classes, the indicators of personal safety improve: trust in people increases (trend) (trend), value-semantic security increases reliably and the risk of post-traumatic growth decreases. Confidence in control of the surrounding world increases. Interpersonal communication indicators are restored: conflict, aggressiveness and manipulative attitude decrease in relationships with adults (trend). In relationships with peers, hostility and aggressiveness decrease (at the trend level). <strong>Conclusions</strong>. Conducting physical education classes in virtual reality is safe for students with disabilities.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Èkstremalʹnaâ psihologiâ i bezopasnostʹ ličnosti.
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17759/epps.2025020204
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological safety of students with disabilities when using virtual technologies in physical education classes

Tatiana Berezina, K.E. Buzanov
2 citations
Èkstremalʹnaâ psihologiâ i bezopasnostʹ ličnosti.
Educational Innovations and Challenges
6.49
article

Psychological safety of students with disabilities when using virtual technologies in physical education classes

Tatiana Berezina, K.E. Buzanov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<p><strong>Context and relevance</strong>. Within the framework of the UNESCO project “Education for All”, special educational projects will be developed for people with disabilities. Modern technologies, including virtual reality, are used to implement such programs. There is a need to assess the psychological safety of using such technologies. <strong>Hypothesis</strong>. Conducting physical education classes using virtual reality technologies for students with disabilities does not violate their psychological safety. <strong>Methods and materials</strong>. The study involved 140 college students, of whom 70 students had health restrictions (based on which they were exempted by the medical commission from basic physical education classes) and 70 healthy students. Students with health restrictions were divided into 2 groups by randomization: experimental and control, 35 people each. Methods: questionnaire “Emotional safety of the environment”, express diagnostics of psychological safety of the individual, questionnaire of the feeling of security, questionnaire “Quality of interpersonal relationships in the educational environment”, methods of mathematical statistics (U criterion Mann Whitney, T criterion Wilcoxon. Training was conducted with the experimental group, 4 lessons, 1 time per week, VR simulators were used: archery (VR: Mediaeval archery), games of Bowling and Darts, educational simulators Boxing and Swimming, a simulator of the game of volleyball and basketball (the All-in-one sports application), games with rackets (First Person Tennis). <strong>Results</strong>. No differences were found between students with disabilities and ordinary students in the indicators of the safety of the educational environment and the feeling of security. 2 differences were found in the scales of safety of relationships: increased conflict with adults and decreased tolerance with peers. In the process of physical education classes, the indicators of personal safety improve: trust in people increases (trend) (trend), value-semantic security increases reliably and the risk of post-traumatic growth decreases. Confidence in control of the surrounding world increases. Interpersonal communication indicators are restored: conflict, aggressiveness and manipulative attitude decrease in relationships with adults (trend). In relationships with peers, hostility and aggressiveness decrease (at the trend level). <strong>Conclusions</strong>. Conducting physical education classes in virtual reality is safe for students with disabilities.</p>

Èkstremalʹnaâ psihologiâ i bezopasnostʹ ličnosti.Vol. 2(2)
Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.