The Phenomenon of International Climate Disinformation: Political Science and Psychological Perspective

The article positions climate change as a critically important area not only of national but also of international politics which becomes increasingly vulnerable to external interference. It examines climate change disinformation disseminated through the international interaction of countries. By analyzing the conceptual frameworks of foreign influence and interference, the authors explore approaches to the correlation of these terms, drawing a number of conclusions. In particular, in the context of climate disinformation, it is appropriate to distinguish between foreign interference and influence. Interference is viewed as a distortion of reality, the division of societies, and the weakening of democracy while influence is seen as a negative or positive phenomenon. The former perceives it as an information weapon against geopolitical adversaries while the latter sees it as the ability to transform external influence into a source of development, rather than threats. The presence of two terms in the academic discourse is claimed, i.e., international or foreign (external) climate disinformation, however, preference is given to the former – international climate disinformation. Characterizing the psychological mechanisms of the climate disinformation spread, attention is drawn to the fact that they generally operate in the same way, regardless of whether the disseminator is international or domestic. Emphasis is placed on the role of cognitive biases, emotional manipulations, rhetorical strategies and logical fallacies, direct attacks on scientists and scientific institutions, often accompanied by stereotypes of demonization or dehumanization. Counteracting the psychological impact of international climate disinformation requires special attention to the problem of cognitive (psychological) inoculation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mediaforum Analytics Forecasts Information Management
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2025.16.139-160
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Phenomenon of International Climate Disinformation: Political Science and Psychological Perspective

Evgeniya Tykhomyrova, Al՚ona Tykhomyrova
Mediaforum Analytics Forecasts Information Management
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

The Phenomenon of International Climate Disinformation: Political Science and Psychological Perspective

Evgeniya Tykhomyrova, Al՚ona Tykhomyrova
article en

Abstract

The article positions climate change as a critically important area not only of national but also of international politics which becomes increasingly vulnerable to external interference. It examines climate change disinformation disseminated through the international interaction of countries. By analyzing the conceptual frameworks of foreign influence and interference, the authors explore approaches to the correlation of these terms, drawing a number of conclusions. In particular, in the context of climate disinformation, it is appropriate to distinguish between foreign interference and influence. Interference is viewed as a distortion of reality, the division of societies, and the weakening of democracy while influence is seen as a negative or positive phenomenon. The former perceives it as an information weapon against geopolitical adversaries while the latter sees it as the ability to transform external influence into a source of development, rather than threats. The presence of two terms in the academic discourse is claimed, i.e., international or foreign (external) climate disinformation, however, preference is given to the former – international climate disinformation. Characterizing the psychological mechanisms of the climate disinformation spread, attention is drawn to the fact that they generally operate in the same way, regardless of whether the disseminator is international or domestic. Emphasis is placed on the role of cognitive biases, emotional manipulations, rhetorical strategies and logical fallacies, direct attacks on scientists and scientific institutions, often accompanied by stereotypes of demonization or dehumanization. Counteracting the psychological impact of international climate disinformation requires special attention to the problem of cognitive (psychological) inoculation.

Mediaforum Analytics Forecasts Information Management(16)
Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University (UA), National University of Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.