Learning filler-gap dependencies with neural language models: Testing island sensitivity in Norwegian and English

Human linguistic input is often claimed to be impoverished with respect to linguistic evidence for complex structural generalizations that children induce. The field of language acquisition is currently debating the ability of various learning algorithms to accurately derive target generalizations from the input. A growing body of research explores whether Neural Language Models (NLMs) can induce human-like generalizations about filler-gap dependencies (FGDs) in English, including island constraints on their distribution. Based on positive results for select test cases, some authors have argued that the relevant generalizations can be learned without domain-specific learning biases (Wilcox et al., 2023), though other researchers dispute this conclusion ((Lan et al., 2024b; Howitt et al.,2024). Previous work focuses solely on English, but broader claims about filler-gap dependency learnability can only be made based on multiple languages and dependency types. To address this gap, we compare the ability of NLMs to learn restrictions on FGDs in English and Norwegian. Our results are mixed: they show that although these models acquire some sophisticated generalizations about filler-gap dependencies in the two languages, their generalizations still diverge from those of humans. When tested on structurally complex environments, the models sometimes adopt narrower generalizations than humans do or overgeneralize beyond their input in non-human-like ways. We conclude that current evidence does not support the claim that FGDs and island constraints on them can be learned without domain-specific biases. • We test filler-gap dependency (FGD) learnability with neural language models (NLMs). • We test whether NLMs can learn different sets of islands in English and Norwegian. • NLMs show mixed success in learning island constraints and unboundedness of FGDs. • NLMs capture cross-linguistic variation in embedded polar Qs (whether-islands). • NLMs do not generalize in human-like ways in some structurally complex environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Memory and Language
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2025.104663
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning filler-gap dependencies with neural language models: Testing island sensitivity in Norwegian and English

Suhas Arehalli, Anastasia Kobzeva, Dave Kush, Tal Linzen
1 citations
Journal of Memory and Language
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Learning filler-gap dependencies with neural language models: Testing island sensitivity in Norwegian and English

Suhas Arehalli, Anastasia Kobzeva, Dave Kush, Tal Linzen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human linguistic input is often claimed to be impoverished with respect to linguistic evidence for complex structural generalizations that children induce. The field of language acquisition is currently debating the ability of various learning algorithms to accurately derive target generalizations from the input. A growing body of research explores whether Neural Language Models (NLMs) can induce human-like generalizations about filler-gap dependencies (FGDs) in English, including island constraints on their distribution. Based on positive results for select test cases, some authors have argued that the relevant generalizations can be learned without domain-specific learning biases (Wilcox et al., 2023), though other researchers dispute this conclusion ((Lan et al., 2024b; Howitt et al.,2024). Previous work focuses solely on English, but broader claims about filler-gap dependency learnability can only be made based on multiple languages and dependency types. To address this gap, we compare the ability of NLMs to learn restrictions on FGDs in English and Norwegian. Our results are mixed: they show that although these models acquire some sophisticated generalizations about filler-gap dependencies in the two languages, their generalizations still diverge from those of humans. When tested on structurally complex environments, the models sometimes adopt narrower generalizations than humans do or overgeneralize beyond their input in non-human-like ways. We conclude that current evidence does not support the claim that FGDs and island constraints on them can be learned without domain-specific biases. • We test filler-gap dependency (FGD) learnability with neural language models (NLMs). • We test whether NLMs can learn different sets of islands in English and Norwegian. • NLMs show mixed success in learning island constraints and unboundedness of FGDs. • NLMs capture cross-linguistic variation in embedded polar Qs (whether-islands). • NLMs do not generalize in human-like ways in some structurally complex environments.

Journal of Memory and LanguageVol. 144
University of Toronto (CA), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Macalester College (US), New York University (US)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.