Comparative Seismic Analysis of Symmetric and Asymmetric RCC Buildings Using ETABS Under Equivalent Static Method

This study presents a comparative seismic analysis of symmetric and asymmetric RC buildings using the Equivalent Static Method as specified in IS 1893:2016. Two G+5 Storey RC buildings, one with a regular rectangular plan and the other with an L-shaped asymmetric configuration, were modeled and analyzed in ETABS software. Identical material properties, loadings, and structural dimensions were maintained for both models to isolate the impact of plan geometry. Key seismic response parameters that were studied included base shear, Storey shear, Storey drift, and Storey displacement. These parameters were evaluated under seismic loads applied in both X and Y directions. Results showed that the asymmetric structure experienced moderately higher responses, with an 8.13% increase in base shear and up to a 10.02% increase in top Storey displacement compared to the symmetric counterpart. Despite these increases, all values remained within the permissible limits outlined in IS 1893:2016. The findings emphasize the influence of plan irregularity on lateral seismic response and support the need for more advanced dynamic analyses in future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.73198
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Seismic Analysis of Symmetric and Asymmetric RCC Buildings Using ETABS Under Equivalent Static Method

Ishaan Trikha
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Structural Analysis and Optimization
article

Comparative Seismic Analysis of Symmetric and Asymmetric RCC Buildings Using ETABS Under Equivalent Static Method

Ishaan Trikha
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative seismic analysis of symmetric and asymmetric RC buildings using the Equivalent Static Method as specified in IS 1893:2016. Two G+5 Storey RC buildings, one with a regular rectangular plan and the other with an L-shaped asymmetric configuration, were modeled and analyzed in ETABS software. Identical material properties, loadings, and structural dimensions were maintained for both models to isolate the impact of plan geometry. Key seismic response parameters that were studied included base shear, Storey shear, Storey drift, and Storey displacement. These parameters were evaluated under seismic loads applied in both X and Y directions. Results showed that the asymmetric structure experienced moderately higher responses, with an 8.13% increase in base shear and up to a 10.02% increase in top Storey displacement compared to the symmetric counterpart. Despite these increases, all values remained within the permissible limits outlined in IS 1893:2016. The findings emphasize the influence of plan irregularity on lateral seismic response and support the need for more advanced dynamic analyses in future studies.

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(7)
Punjab Engineering College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Structural Analysis and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.