Developing a measurement model to assess perceived housing inequality: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses

Housing inequality and resulting housing crisis are pressing global issues with significant socioeconomic implications. This study develops a robust measurement model for assessing housing inequality from residents' perspectives, filling a critical gap in the existing literature that largely overlooks subjective perceptions. By conceptualising housing inequality as a multidimensional construct encompassing affordability, sanitation, comfort, maintenance, safety and security, space, local facilities, accessibility, and social inclusivity, our model captures nuanced disparities that conventional metrics may miss. This study addresses the lack of a standardised measurement model for perceived housing inequality, which has hindered comparative research and policy development. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), the model was validated through data from Nottingham, a city from the UK with notable socioeconomic diversity and high deprivation levels. Study findings highlight that perceived housing inequality, rooted in individual assessments of housing quality, affordability, and neighbourhood environment, is equally significant as its traditional nature, which mostly focuses on objective indicators such as income or housing availability. Theoretically, the study challenges conventional economic and spatial debates that rely solely on objective measures. It highlights the role of perception in shaping urban experiences and social cohesion, offering a holistic framework that integrates subjective dimensions of housing inequality. This study provides insights that researchers, local authorities, and policymakers can use to assess perceived housing inequality more accurately, guiding targeted interventions and promoting equitable urban development across diverse urban contexts. • This study develops a standardised measurement model for perceived housing inequality, operationalised in an urban setting. • The research model incorporates both neighbourhood-level attributes and housing characteristics. • Perceived housing inequality is multidimensional, reflecting how residents experience disparities. • Perceived housing inequality is as crucial as objective housing metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106276
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a measurement model to assess perceived housing inequality: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses

Taimaz Larimian, Tan Yiğitcanlar, Mahla Tayefi Nasrabadi
2 citations
Cities
Housing Market and Economics
6.26
article

Developing a measurement model to assess perceived housing inequality: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses

Taimaz Larimian, Tan Yiğitcanlar, Mahla Tayefi Nasrabadi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Housing inequality and resulting housing crisis are pressing global issues with significant socioeconomic implications. This study develops a robust measurement model for assessing housing inequality from residents' perspectives, filling a critical gap in the existing literature that largely overlooks subjective perceptions. By conceptualising housing inequality as a multidimensional construct encompassing affordability, sanitation, comfort, maintenance, safety and security, space, local facilities, accessibility, and social inclusivity, our model captures nuanced disparities that conventional metrics may miss. This study addresses the lack of a standardised measurement model for perceived housing inequality, which has hindered comparative research and policy development. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), the model was validated through data from Nottingham, a city from the UK with notable socioeconomic diversity and high deprivation levels. Study findings highlight that perceived housing inequality, rooted in individual assessments of housing quality, affordability, and neighbourhood environment, is equally significant as its traditional nature, which mostly focuses on objective indicators such as income or housing availability. Theoretically, the study challenges conventional economic and spatial debates that rely solely on objective measures. It highlights the role of perception in shaping urban experiences and social cohesion, offering a holistic framework that integrates subjective dimensions of housing inequality. This study provides insights that researchers, local authorities, and policymakers can use to assess perceived housing inequality more accurately, guiding targeted interventions and promoting equitable urban development across diverse urban contexts. • This study develops a standardised measurement model for perceived housing inequality, operationalised in an urban setting. • The research model incorporates both neighbourhood-level attributes and housing characteristics. • Perceived housing inequality is multidimensional, reflecting how residents experience disparities. • Perceived housing inequality is as crucial as objective housing metrics.

CitiesVol. 166
Loughborough University (GB), Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Housing Market and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.