‘Most People with Long COVID Are Their Own Doctors’: Self-Tracking and Online Patient Groups as Pathways to Challenging Epistemic Injustice

This article focuses on the struggles of people with Long COVID to obtain diagnoses and treatment in the face of medical dismissal and ignorance. Drawing on interviews with people with Long COVID who have engaged in self-tracking activities, it illustrates how these practices proved a valuable, if not completely successful, way to challenge medical dominance and epistemic privilege in relation to this contested illness. Furthermore, study findings demonstrate the important yet understudied role of online Long COVID patient communities in supporting self-tracking. The capacity for sharing patient-generated information through these communities offers a way for collective knowledge and interpretive resources to be amassed that can support communities of practice and mitigate hermeneutical injustice. The article contributes to scholarship on the role of digital apps, devices and communities in the generation and distribution of lay knowledge relating to Long COVID, as well as to the sociology of diagnosis and contested illnesses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251351252
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Most People with Long COVID Are Their Own Doctors’: Self-Tracking and Online Patient Groups as Pathways to Challenging Epistemic Injustice

Deborah A. Lupton, Sazana Jayadeva
1 citations
Sociology
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
1.39
article

‘Most People with Long COVID Are Their Own Doctors’: Self-Tracking and Online Patient Groups as Pathways to Challenging Epistemic Injustice

Deborah A. Lupton, Sazana Jayadeva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article focuses on the struggles of people with Long COVID to obtain diagnoses and treatment in the face of medical dismissal and ignorance. Drawing on interviews with people with Long COVID who have engaged in self-tracking activities, it illustrates how these practices proved a valuable, if not completely successful, way to challenge medical dominance and epistemic privilege in relation to this contested illness. Furthermore, study findings demonstrate the important yet understudied role of online Long COVID patient communities in supporting self-tracking. The capacity for sharing patient-generated information through these communities offers a way for collective knowledge and interpretive resources to be amassed that can support communities of practice and mitigate hermeneutical injustice. The article contributes to scholarship on the role of digital apps, devices and communities in the generation and distribution of lay knowledge relating to Long COVID, as well as to the sociology of diagnosis and contested illnesses.

SociologyVol. 60(2)
University of Surrey (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.