Development of the TrendBurden Survey: Assessing Perceived Documentation Burden among Health Professionals in the United States

Documentation burden contributes to health professional burnout and negatively impacts health professional well-being and patient care quality. Yet, there is a gap in the literature regarding an effective measure to assess the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in a wide range of care settings over time.We developed and administered a pulse survey to trend, with subsequent administrations, the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in all care settings in the United States over time.A multimethods approach was used which included conducting a scoping review of the literature to identify and then curate a set of potential survey items based on scoping review results. Next, a modified Delphi approach was used with clinical informatics experts for consensus-driven item selection and pulse survey development. Finally, we administered the pulse survey nationally using snowball sampling through professional listservs and networks of organizations.The scoping review helped to identify constructs and items to include on the pulse survey. After four iterations of the modified Delphi approach, consensus was reached on five final items for the pulse survey, labeled "TrendBurden." The first administration of "TrendBurden" was completed by 1,253 healthcare professionals in April 2024. Most respondents (73.26%) disagreed that the time and effort spent documenting patient care is appropriate, with 77.42% reporting finishing work later or needing to work from home due to excessive documentation tasks. Seventy-four point three-eight percent agreed that the effort or time required to complete documentation tasks impedes patient care, and less than one-third (31.76%) agreed that the EHR is easy to use.The "TrendBurden" Pulse Survey was developed through a scoping review of the literature and expert consensus. The resulting five-question pulse survey was administered nationally and provided insight into current perceptions of documentation burden among healthcare professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2562-0910
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the TrendBurden Survey: Assessing Perceived Documentation Burden among Health Professionals in the United States

Vince Hartman, Sami Aftab Abdul, Kyle Marshall, Elizabeth A. Sloss et al.
Applied Clinical Informatics
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Development of the TrendBurden Survey: Assessing Perceived Documentation Burden among Health Professionals in the United States

Vince Hartman, Sami Aftab Abdul, Kyle Marshall, Elizabeth A. Sloss, James Szymanski, Zachary Pope, Kevin B. Johnson, Anup Kumar Mishra, Sarah Collins Rossetti, Barry Newman, Ayomide Owoyemi, A O Grigg, Sarah Corley, Deborah R Levy, Toni Phillips, Davis Austria, Matthew R. Allen, Judy Murphy, Kevin D. Smith, Faraaz Chekeni, Kathleen Sidwell, Gigi Dawood
article en

Abstract

Documentation burden contributes to health professional burnout and negatively impacts health professional well-being and patient care quality. Yet, there is a gap in the literature regarding an effective measure to assess the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in a wide range of care settings over time.We developed and administered a pulse survey to trend, with subsequent administrations, the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in all care settings in the United States over time.A multimethods approach was used which included conducting a scoping review of the literature to identify and then curate a set of potential survey items based on scoping review results. Next, a modified Delphi approach was used with clinical informatics experts for consensus-driven item selection and pulse survey development. Finally, we administered the pulse survey nationally using snowball sampling through professional listservs and networks of organizations.The scoping review helped to identify constructs and items to include on the pulse survey. After four iterations of the modified Delphi approach, consensus was reached on five final items for the pulse survey, labeled "TrendBurden." The first administration of "TrendBurden" was completed by 1,253 healthcare professionals in April 2024. Most respondents (73.26%) disagreed that the time and effort spent documenting patient care is appropriate, with 77.42% reporting finishing work later or needing to work from home due to excessive documentation tasks. Seventy-four point three-eight percent agreed that the effort or time required to complete documentation tasks impedes patient care, and less than one-third (31.76%) agreed that the EHR is easy to use.The "TrendBurden" Pulse Survey was developed through a scoping review of the literature and expert consensus. The resulting five-question pulse survey was administered nationally and provided insight into current perceptions of documentation burden among healthcare professionals.

Applied Clinical InformaticsVol. 16(03)
American Medical Informatics Association (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), University of Utah (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), UW Health University Hospital (US), Grande Ronde Hospital (US), WinnMed (US), Yale University (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), John D. Dingell VA Medical Center (US), North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (US), Amarillo VA Health Care System (US), Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), Department of Veterans Affairs (AU), Interactive Research and Development (PK), UC Davis Health (US), Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation (US), Mitre (United States) (US), The Ohio State University (US), Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Providence Health & Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.