Debiased learning of the causal net benefit with censored event time data

Summary Cox regression is the default approach to evaluating the (relative) effect of two treatments on a survival endpoint. This standard framework has nonetheless been criticized for its canonical effect measure, the hazard ratio, having a subtle interpretation, thereby hindering policy-making. This in turn has prompted interest in other effects measures, such as the difference in restricted mean survival time, the net benefit and the win ratio, which have become increasingly popular. Developments in estimation and inference for the net benefit and win ratio proceed either under a semiparametric model, at the risk of bias due to model misspecification, or in a nonparametric model, but without the flexibility to adjust for covariates. In this paper, we overcome these challenges by introducing a scalar, model-free measure of conditional causal net benefit in terms of counterfactuals and developing a debiased estimator based on its efficient influence function. This estimator is root-$ n $ consistent and asymptotically model-free by flexibly enabling data-adaptive learning (e.g., machine learning) of the dependence of treatment, survival and censoring time on baseline covariates. By incorporating such covariates, the proposed estimators can improve the efficiency of randomized trial analyses, as well as correct for confounding and censoring bias in both randomized and observational studies. We also propose variations of the considered estimand (and estimator) that have a more favourable efficiency bound. The proposed method is illustrated by simulation studies and analysis of breast cancer data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrika
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asaf051
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debiased learning of the causal net benefit with censored event time data

Stijn Vansteelandt, Torben Martinussen
Biometrika
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Debiased learning of the causal net benefit with censored event time data

Stijn Vansteelandt, Torben Martinussen
article en

Abstract

Summary Cox regression is the default approach to evaluating the (relative) effect of two treatments on a survival endpoint. This standard framework has nonetheless been criticized for its canonical effect measure, the hazard ratio, having a subtle interpretation, thereby hindering policy-making. This in turn has prompted interest in other effects measures, such as the difference in restricted mean survival time, the net benefit and the win ratio, which have become increasingly popular. Developments in estimation and inference for the net benefit and win ratio proceed either under a semiparametric model, at the risk of bias due to model misspecification, or in a nonparametric model, but without the flexibility to adjust for covariates. In this paper, we overcome these challenges by introducing a scalar, model-free measure of conditional causal net benefit in terms of counterfactuals and developing a debiased estimator based on its efficient influence function. This estimator is root-$ n $ consistent and asymptotically model-free by flexibly enabling data-adaptive learning (e.g., machine learning) of the dependence of treatment, survival and censoring time on baseline covariates. By incorporating such covariates, the proposed estimators can improve the efficiency of randomized trial analyses, as well as correct for confounding and censoring bias in both randomized and observational studies. We also propose variations of the considered estimand (and estimator) that have a more favourable efficiency bound. The proposed method is illustrated by simulation studies and analysis of breast cancer data.

BiometrikaVol. 112(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK), HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Ghent University (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.