Comparative evaluation of biological and mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in a middle-aged population: a population-based cohort study
Among middle-aged Asian patients undergoing AVR, biological and mechanical prostheses yield similar long-term survival, yet biological prostheses carry a lower risk of major adverse events, especially in those aged 55-64. Opting for biological prostheses at a younger age, potentially starting at age 55, may offer advantages in improving long-term outcomes.
Authors
- Fang‐Ju Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-7481)
- Chung‐Hsuen Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-1922)
- Nai‐Hsin Chi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4731-1653)
- Chia-Jui Chang
- Ling-Ya Huang
Institutions
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
- Taipei Medical University (TW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Heart
- Published
- 2025-07-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325648
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Taiwan University