Comparative evaluation of biological and mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in a middle-aged population: a population-based cohort study

Among middle-aged Asian patients undergoing AVR, biological and mechanical prostheses yield similar long-term survival, yet biological prostheses carry a lower risk of major adverse events, especially in those aged 55-64. Opting for biological prostheses at a younger age, potentially starting at age 55, may offer advantages in improving long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325648
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of biological and mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in a middle-aged population: a population-based cohort study

Fang‐Ju Lin, Chung‐Hsuen Wu, Nai‐Hsin Chi, Chia-Jui Chang et al.
Heart
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Comparative evaluation of biological and mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in a middle-aged population: a population-based cohort study

Fang‐Ju Lin, Chung‐Hsuen Wu, Nai‐Hsin Chi, Chia-Jui Chang, Ling-Ya Huang
article en

Abstract

Among middle-aged Asian patients undergoing AVR, biological and mechanical prostheses yield similar long-term survival, yet biological prostheses carry a lower risk of major adverse events, especially in those aged 55-64. Opting for biological prostheses at a younger age, potentially starting at age 55, may offer advantages in improving long-term outcomes.

HeartVol. 112(6)
National Taiwan University (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW)
National Taiwan University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.