Reynolds Number Effects on the Surface Pressures on a 5.2%-Scale High Lift Common Research Model

A 5.2%-scale High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) semispan wind tunnel model was tested at the National Transonic Facility (NTF) wind tunnel in Hampton, VA. One of the primary objectives of the NTF test was to determine the effect of varying Reynolds number on the configuration. Using a combination of air and cryogenic nitrogen during testing, Reynolds numbers, based on the mean aerodynamic chord of the model, from 1.6 to 30 million were obtained. The focus of this work was on the landing configuration, which was tested at a speed of Mach 0.2. Surface pressure data were obtained at 10 chord stations on the wing, using static pressure taps distributed across the slat, main element, and flap. Comparisons of the surface pressure data at an angle of attack in the linear range of the lift curve (8 degrees) and at the maximum lift coefficient (����,������) were studied and compared at each Reynolds number tested. Trends in the surface pressures were also examined with respect to measured lift and pitching moment data to determine the most likely aerodynamic contributors. Overall, the surface pressure results for the landing configuration corroborated lift coefficient changes seen with different Reynolds numbers in both the linear and ����,������ regions of the lift curves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3462
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reynolds Number Effects on the Surface Pressures on a 5.2%-Scale High Lift Common Research Model

Courtney S. Winski, Melissa B. Rivers, Sarah Langston
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

Reynolds Number Effects on the Surface Pressures on a 5.2%-Scale High Lift Common Research Model

Courtney S. Winski, Melissa B. Rivers, Sarah Langston
article en

Abstract

A 5.2%-scale High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) semispan wind tunnel model was tested at the National Transonic Facility (NTF) wind tunnel in Hampton, VA. One of the primary objectives of the NTF test was to determine the effect of varying Reynolds number on the configuration. Using a combination of air and cryogenic nitrogen during testing, Reynolds numbers, based on the mean aerodynamic chord of the model, from 1.6 to 30 million were obtained. The focus of this work was on the landing configuration, which was tested at a speed of Mach 0.2. Surface pressure data were obtained at 10 chord stations on the wing, using static pressure taps distributed across the slat, main element, and flap. Comparisons of the surface pressure data at an angle of attack in the linear range of the lift curve (8 degrees) and at the maximum lift coefficient (����,������) were studied and compared at each Reynolds number tested. Trends in the surface pressures were also examined with respect to measured lift and pitching moment data to determine the most likely aerodynamic contributors. Overall, the surface pressure results for the landing configuration corroborated lift coefficient changes seen with different Reynolds numbers in both the linear and ����,������ regions of the lift curves.

Langley Research Center (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reynolds Number Effects on the Surface Pressures on a 5.2%-Scale High Lift Common Research Model — Courtney S. Winski, Melissa B. Rivers, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS