A Limited Handling Qualities Evaluation of an Optionally Piloted Personal Air Vehicle During Manned-Unmanned Teaming Landing Tasks

This paper summarizes handling qualities test results for an optionally piloted vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) personal air vehicle (PAV) flight simulator using the Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHRS) and an alternative rating scale. Such alternative rating scale has been designed to include ratings for all possible task performance and pilot compensation combinations, unlike the CHRS. This research’s objective is to validate an alternative handling qualities rating scale to the CHRS that provides more valid, reliable, and robust evaluations. This paper summarizes the limited handling qualities evaluation results from both rating scales. This paper first describes the alternative rating scale system’s design in comparison to the CHRS. This paper then outlines the test methods and results from a series of single-ship and two-ship manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) landing approach tasks. A discussion of the results summarizes differences among rating scales and test scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3610
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Limited Handling Qualities Evaluation of an Optionally Piloted Personal Air Vehicle During Manned-Unmanned Teaming Landing Tasks

Natalia Kabaliuk, Oliver Grant, Prospero A. Uybarreta
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

A Limited Handling Qualities Evaluation of an Optionally Piloted Personal Air Vehicle During Manned-Unmanned Teaming Landing Tasks

Natalia Kabaliuk, Oliver Grant, Prospero A. Uybarreta
article en

Abstract

This paper summarizes handling qualities test results for an optionally piloted vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) personal air vehicle (PAV) flight simulator using the Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHRS) and an alternative rating scale. Such alternative rating scale has been designed to include ratings for all possible task performance and pilot compensation combinations, unlike the CHRS. This research’s objective is to validate an alternative handling qualities rating scale to the CHRS that provides more valid, reliable, and robust evaluations. This paper summarizes the limited handling qualities evaluation results from both rating scales. This paper first describes the alternative rating scale system’s design in comparison to the CHRS. This paper then outlines the test methods and results from a series of single-ship and two-ship manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) landing approach tasks. A discussion of the results summarizes differences among rating scales and test scenarios.

University of Auckland (NZ), University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Limited Handling Qualities Evaluation of an Optionally Piloted Personal Air Vehicle During Manned-Unmanned Teaming Landing Tasks — Natalia Kabaliuk, Oliver Grant, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS