Phase Synchronization in Noise Control: Advantages, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

This study provides an in-depth experimental investigation into the aeroacoustic characteristics of Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) systems, emphasizing the influence of relative phase angles between adjacent propellers. Phase synchronization is identified as a highly effective noise reduction strategy, leveraging destructive interference within the coherent acoustic source field generated by the propellers. Experiments were conducted at a constant propeller rotation rate of 5000 rpm across various advance ratios to examine the impact of operational conditions on noise emissions. Results reveal a clear relationship between relative phase angles and far-field noise levels, with the most significant noise attenuation observed at a phase angle of Δψ = 90°.At this configuration, reductions in the first blade passing frequency (BPF) amplitude reached up to 24 dB under inflow conditions (J > 0), compared to Δψ = 0°, highlighting the potential of phase synchronization in mitigating tonal noise. This reduction is attributed to destructive wave interference driven by the angular positioning of the propeller blades. The results confirm that phase control can be a powerful tool in reducing perceived loudness and psychoacoustic annoyance, especially under inflow conditions (J > 0). To implement and evaluate precise phase control, a LabVIEW-based dual-loop feedback controller was developed and tested on a twin-rotor system in non-axial flight. The controller maintained phase deviations within 1.5% (approximately 5°) across various tip Mach numbers and inflow velocities, demonstrating robust and consistent performance. SPL directivity measurements revealed that while Δψ = 90° effectively reduced noise in axial flight, its benefits in non-axial configurations were more localized and direction-dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3647
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase Synchronization in Noise Control: Advantages, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Mahdi Azarpeyvand, Djamel Rezgui, Burak Buda Turhan, Zilei Yi
2 citations
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
2.97
article

Phase Synchronization in Noise Control: Advantages, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Mahdi Azarpeyvand, Djamel Rezgui, Burak Buda Turhan, Zilei Yi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth experimental investigation into the aeroacoustic characteristics of Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) systems, emphasizing the influence of relative phase angles between adjacent propellers. Phase synchronization is identified as a highly effective noise reduction strategy, leveraging destructive interference within the coherent acoustic source field generated by the propellers. Experiments were conducted at a constant propeller rotation rate of 5000 rpm across various advance ratios to examine the impact of operational conditions on noise emissions. Results reveal a clear relationship between relative phase angles and far-field noise levels, with the most significant noise attenuation observed at a phase angle of Δψ = 90°.At this configuration, reductions in the first blade passing frequency (BPF) amplitude reached up to 24 dB under inflow conditions (J > 0), compared to Δψ = 0°, highlighting the potential of phase synchronization in mitigating tonal noise. This reduction is attributed to destructive wave interference driven by the angular positioning of the propeller blades. The results confirm that phase control can be a powerful tool in reducing perceived loudness and psychoacoustic annoyance, especially under inflow conditions (J > 0). To implement and evaluate precise phase control, a LabVIEW-based dual-loop feedback controller was developed and tested on a twin-rotor system in non-axial flight. The controller maintained phase deviations within 1.5% (approximately 5°) across various tip Mach numbers and inflow velocities, demonstrating robust and consistent performance. SPL directivity measurements revealed that while Δψ = 90° effectively reduced noise in axial flight, its benefits in non-axial configurations were more localized and direction-dependent.

University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.