Performance and Regulatory Assessment Trim Formulations for Conceptual Aircraft Design

This paper introduces a geometry-centric, open-source aircraft flight simulation framework designed to address limitations in traditional conceptual aircraft design methods, especially regarding regulatory-driven steady-state (trim) analyses. Conventional approaches, which primarily rely on empirical relationships developed from historical data, prove insufficient for accurately capturing emerging electrified propulsion systems and unconventional aircraft architectures. To overcome these challenges, the proposed framework integrates multidisciplinary analyses, accommodates models across a spectrum of fidelity—from low-fidelity empirical equations to detailed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and experimental data—and supports various aircraft configurations, including fixed-wing and vertical-lift vehicles, conventional fuels and electric energy sources, and novel propulsion and powertrain architectures. Additionally, the framework leverages gradient-based optimization techniques, enabling efficient exploration of large-scale aircraft design spaces. Complementing this framework, the paper introduces specialized trim formulations structured as optimization problems. These formulations efficiently compute steady-state flight conditions and explicitly relate key aircraft performance metrics to applicable regulatory requirements outlined in 14-CFR, thus supporting certification-driven design. Demonstrations featuring a general aviation aircraft (Cessna 172), a commercial transport aircraft (Boeing 777), and NASA’s distributed electric propulsion concept (X-57) validate the framework's versatility and effectiveness across diverse aircraft configurations and use cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3624
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance and Regulatory Assessment Trim Formulations for Conceptual Aircraft Design

Darshan Sarojini, J. D. Gould, Nathan Shune, David Solano Sarmiento
1 citations
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
article

Performance and Regulatory Assessment Trim Formulations for Conceptual Aircraft Design

Darshan Sarojini, J. D. Gould, Nathan Shune, David Solano Sarmiento
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper introduces a geometry-centric, open-source aircraft flight simulation framework designed to address limitations in traditional conceptual aircraft design methods, especially regarding regulatory-driven steady-state (trim) analyses. Conventional approaches, which primarily rely on empirical relationships developed from historical data, prove insufficient for accurately capturing emerging electrified propulsion systems and unconventional aircraft architectures. To overcome these challenges, the proposed framework integrates multidisciplinary analyses, accommodates models across a spectrum of fidelity—from low-fidelity empirical equations to detailed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and experimental data—and supports various aircraft configurations, including fixed-wing and vertical-lift vehicles, conventional fuels and electric energy sources, and novel propulsion and powertrain architectures. Additionally, the framework leverages gradient-based optimization techniques, enabling efficient exploration of large-scale aircraft design spaces. Complementing this framework, the paper introduces specialized trim formulations structured as optimization problems. These formulations efficiently compute steady-state flight conditions and explicitly relate key aircraft performance metrics to applicable regulatory requirements outlined in 14-CFR, thus supporting certification-driven design. Demonstrations featuring a general aviation aircraft (Cessna 172), a commercial transport aircraft (Boeing 777), and NASA’s distributed electric propulsion concept (X-57) validate the framework's versatility and effectiveness across diverse aircraft configurations and use cases.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.