Horizontal Tail Design Process for Modern Tactical Military Aircraft: Comparative Analysis of T-Tail vs Body-Mounted Layout

The following paper examines the reasons behind the widespread adoption of the T-tail architecture in recently designed tactical military aircraft. First, the reasons were sought in preliminary design techniques, such as the scissor plot, with a focus on the take-off rotation condition, which is often limiting for aircraft with Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) capabilities. A comparative analysis between the T-tail and conventional empennage configurations is carried out through the redesign of the C-130J-30. The analysis reveals that takeoff rotation conditions no longer represent the primary constraint on aircraft maneuverability, thereby facilitating enhanced ground performance characteristics. Time-domain simulation studies corroborate these findings, demonstrating superior rotation performance achieved through T-tail implementation. These results indicate that T-tail configurations not only satisfy conventional empennage performance requirements but may substantially exceed them in operational effectiveness. Although the T-tail architecture shows greater structural and design complexities, it offers a crucial advantage from a performance and loadability standpoint. A T-tail design has been demonstrated to result in a 15% reduction in stabilizer area, provided that the performance requirements remain unchanged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3424
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Simulation and Modeling Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Horizontal Tail Design Process for Modern Tactical Military Aircraft: Comparative Analysis of T-Tail vs Body-Mounted Layout

Gabriele Morra, Fabrizio Nicolosi
1 citations
Simulation and Modeling Applications
1.21
article

Horizontal Tail Design Process for Modern Tactical Military Aircraft: Comparative Analysis of T-Tail vs Body-Mounted Layout

Gabriele Morra, Fabrizio Nicolosi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The following paper examines the reasons behind the widespread adoption of the T-tail architecture in recently designed tactical military aircraft. First, the reasons were sought in preliminary design techniques, such as the scissor plot, with a focus on the take-off rotation condition, which is often limiting for aircraft with Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) capabilities. A comparative analysis between the T-tail and conventional empennage configurations is carried out through the redesign of the C-130J-30. The analysis reveals that takeoff rotation conditions no longer represent the primary constraint on aircraft maneuverability, thereby facilitating enhanced ground performance characteristics. Time-domain simulation studies corroborate these findings, demonstrating superior rotation performance achieved through T-tail implementation. These results indicate that T-tail configurations not only satisfy conventional empennage performance requirements but may substantially exceed them in operational effectiveness. Although the T-tail architecture shows greater structural and design complexities, it offers a crucial advantage from a performance and loadability standpoint. A T-tail design has been demonstrated to result in a 15% reduction in stabilizer area, provided that the performance requirements remain unchanged.

University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Simulation and Modeling Applications
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.