An Experiment for Strengthening U.S. Workforce Capacity Utilization

Inefficient use of the labor force erodes U.S. leadership in competition with authoritarian competitors. The impacts of layoffs across the labor market and larger economy represent a significant inefficiency in the capitalist system. While individual companies need mechanisms for reducing their workforces during downturns, shortening or eliminating the time that workers are unemployed would mitigate the impact of this inefficiency on the economy. Workforce development funding rarely supports the existing labor force, focusing instead on the pipeline of workers who will later enter the workforce. As a result, the state of the art in tempering layoff-related inefficiencies encompasses online marketplaces, outplacement services, recruiting organizations, and efforts by individual workers. A completely different approach is to think creatively about job requirements and skills before a layoff is even considered. This paper tests the hypothesis that two unrelated job functions in two different industries are similar enough to warrant cross training and, subsequently, cross placement. Real-time space mission operations and geosteering, technical job functions supporting operations in aerospace and oil and gas respectively, involve similar skills, software, data types, and work cultures. Both geosteering and space operations involve interpreting positional and directional data to guide real-time decision-making about operational maneuvers in three-dimensional space in an alien and remote medium without visual contact, with a time delay in positional communications, and 24-hour, 7-day-per-week operations. Both functions also operate with high accountability and non-unique solutions that often defy automation, and they are performed in support of cyclical industries with frequent and far-reaching layoffs. Although orbital dynamics differ from the geologic principles underlying geosteering, similarities are examined from the perspective of first principles. In this experiment, an experienced geosteerer and an experienced space operator cross trained each other. They determined that it had been far easier to train each other than it would have been to train a random worker. They then found and leapt a higher hurdle. Each determined that it would be more difficult and time consuming to train a new graduate with a bachelor’s degree in their own field than it had been to train their experienced counterpart in this experiment. This result demonstrates the possibility of a more flexible and adaptable workforce that can increase workforce capacity utilization, exchange knowledge across industries, and support U.S. global leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-4119
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Experiment for Strengthening U.S. Workforce Capacity Utilization

Alanna Oleary, Lee Steinke, Jason Harms
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

An Experiment for Strengthening U.S. Workforce Capacity Utilization

Alanna Oleary, Lee Steinke, Jason Harms
article en

Abstract

Inefficient use of the labor force erodes U.S. leadership in competition with authoritarian competitors. The impacts of layoffs across the labor market and larger economy represent a significant inefficiency in the capitalist system. While individual companies need mechanisms for reducing their workforces during downturns, shortening or eliminating the time that workers are unemployed would mitigate the impact of this inefficiency on the economy. Workforce development funding rarely supports the existing labor force, focusing instead on the pipeline of workers who will later enter the workforce. As a result, the state of the art in tempering layoff-related inefficiencies encompasses online marketplaces, outplacement services, recruiting organizations, and efforts by individual workers. A completely different approach is to think creatively about job requirements and skills before a layoff is even considered. This paper tests the hypothesis that two unrelated job functions in two different industries are similar enough to warrant cross training and, subsequently, cross placement. Real-time space mission operations and geosteering, technical job functions supporting operations in aerospace and oil and gas respectively, involve similar skills, software, data types, and work cultures. Both geosteering and space operations involve interpreting positional and directional data to guide real-time decision-making about operational maneuvers in three-dimensional space in an alien and remote medium without visual contact, with a time delay in positional communications, and 24-hour, 7-day-per-week operations. Both functions also operate with high accountability and non-unique solutions that often defy automation, and they are performed in support of cyclical industries with frequent and far-reaching layoffs. Although orbital dynamics differ from the geologic principles underlying geosteering, similarities are examined from the perspective of first principles. In this experiment, an experienced geosteerer and an experienced space operator cross trained each other. They determined that it had been far easier to train each other than it would have been to train a random worker. They then found and leapt a higher hurdle. Each determined that it would be more difficult and time consuming to train a new graduate with a bachelor’s degree in their own field than it had been to train their experienced counterpart in this experiment. This result demonstrates the possibility of a more flexible and adaptable workforce that can increase workforce capacity utilization, exchange knowledge across industries, and support U.S. global leadership.

Ennetix (United States) (US), Oceaneering International (United States) (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.