Aerodynamic Performance of Distributed Electric Propulsion Wing Under Different Design and Operating Parameters

This study aims to experimentally and numerically investigate and compare the aerodynamic performance of two triple-propulsor leading-edge mounted Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) configuration. The experiments are conducted in the Wind Tunnel Facilities at the University of Bristol. Propeller performance is examined experimentally against their positions on the wing at different inflow speeds and wing angles of attack (AoA). Numerical Vortex Particle Method (VPM) simulations are carried out to compare with the experimental aerodynamic results, and provide an exploratory noise comparison between the configurations. The DEP configurations involved in the current work are three 12-inch (the 12-12-12 configuration) and three 15-inch (the 15-15-15 configuration) propellers. Aerodynamic measurements for the propellers and the overall wing are examined and analysed at inflow speeds of 10 and 20m/s. The 15-15-15 configuration is operating at lower propeller rotational speeds to match overall thrust to be the same as of the 12-12-12 configuration. The aerodynamic measurements indicate that mid propeller produces less thrust than adjacent propellers while having comparable torque, and this difference becomes more significant as propeller rotational speeds and wing AoA increase. For the 12-12-12 configuration, the propeller performance is less sensitive to the change of angle of attacks at 10m/s, whereas a noticeable increment in thrust is captured for the inboard propeller for the 15-15-15 configuration as AoA increases. Wing performance comparison indicates that the 15-15-15 wing has slight lift-to-drag ratio improvements at low angles of attack, whereas the 12-12-12 configuration is marginally more favourable at high angles of attack. Numerical simulations show good agreement on propeller thrust predictions, whereas torque predictions significantly vary across different positions on the wing. The noise results indicate that the 15-15-15 configuration has a lower tonal noise emission than the 12-12-12 configuration at 1st Blade Passing Frequency (BPF) when producing the same thrust on the wing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3096
Primary Topic
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerodynamic Performance of Distributed Electric Propulsion Wing Under Different Design and Operating Parameters

Beckett Yx Zhou, Han Fang, Mahdi Azarpeyvand, Djamel Rezgui et al.
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
article

Aerodynamic Performance of Distributed Electric Propulsion Wing Under Different Design and Operating Parameters

Beckett Yx Zhou, Han Fang, Mahdi Azarpeyvand, Djamel Rezgui, Burak Buda Turhan, Bin Zang, Luis Fernando Lopes de Moraes Filho, Abhishek Gautam
article en

Abstract

This study aims to experimentally and numerically investigate and compare the aerodynamic performance of two triple-propulsor leading-edge mounted Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) configuration. The experiments are conducted in the Wind Tunnel Facilities at the University of Bristol. Propeller performance is examined experimentally against their positions on the wing at different inflow speeds and wing angles of attack (AoA). Numerical Vortex Particle Method (VPM) simulations are carried out to compare with the experimental aerodynamic results, and provide an exploratory noise comparison between the configurations. The DEP configurations involved in the current work are three 12-inch (the 12-12-12 configuration) and three 15-inch (the 15-15-15 configuration) propellers. Aerodynamic measurements for the propellers and the overall wing are examined and analysed at inflow speeds of 10 and 20m/s. The 15-15-15 configuration is operating at lower propeller rotational speeds to match overall thrust to be the same as of the 12-12-12 configuration. The aerodynamic measurements indicate that mid propeller produces less thrust than adjacent propellers while having comparable torque, and this difference becomes more significant as propeller rotational speeds and wing AoA increase. For the 12-12-12 configuration, the propeller performance is less sensitive to the change of angle of attacks at 10m/s, whereas a noticeable increment in thrust is captured for the inboard propeller for the 15-15-15 configuration as AoA increases. Wing performance comparison indicates that the 15-15-15 wing has slight lift-to-drag ratio improvements at low angles of attack, whereas the 12-12-12 configuration is marginally more favourable at high angles of attack. Numerical simulations show good agreement on propeller thrust predictions, whereas torque predictions significantly vary across different positions on the wing. The noise results indicate that the 15-15-15 configuration has a lower tonal noise emission than the 12-12-12 configuration at 1st Blade Passing Frequency (BPF) when producing the same thrust on the wing.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.